Cited by 58Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recommendations for terminology and the identification of neuropathic pain in people with spine-related leg pain. Outcomes from the NeuPSIG working group

Open access

Abstract

Pain radiating from the spine into the leg is commonly referred to as “sciatica,” “Sciatica” may include various conditions such as radicular pain or painful radiculopathy. It may be associated with significant consequences for the person living with the condition, imposing a reduced quality of life and substantial direct and indirect costs. The main challenges associated with a diagnosis of “sciatica” include those related to the inconsistent use of terminology for the diagnostic labels and the identification of neuropathic pain. These challenges hinder collective clinical and scientific understanding regarding these conditions. In this position paper, we describe the outcome of a working group commissioned by the Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group (NeuPSIG) of the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) which was tasked with the following objectives: (1) to revise the use of terminology for classifying spine-related leg pain and (2) to propose a way forward on the identification of neuropathic pain in the context of spine-related leg pain. The panel recommended discouraging the term “sciatica” for use in clinical practice and research without further specification of what it entails. The term “spine-related leg pain” is proposed as an umbrella term to include the case definitions of somatic referred pain and radicular pain with and without radiculopathy. The panel proposed an adaptation of the neuropathic pain grading system in the context of spine-related leg pain to facilitate the identification of neuropathic pain and initiation of specific management in this patient population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002919

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. Terminology used in clinical trials to describe the study population with spine-related leg pain. Adapted from Lin et al.43
Figure 1. Terminology used in clinical trials to describe the study population with spine-related leg pain. Adapted from Lin et al.43CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2. Results of the NeuPSIG membership terminology survey. Participants were invited to nominate their preference for the proposed terminologies. NeuPSIG, Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group.
Figure 2. Results of the NeuPSIG membership terminology survey. Participants were invited to nominate their preference for the proposed terminologies. NeuPSIG, Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3. Panel ratings for the importance of identifying neuropathic pain in a person with spine-related leg pain.
Figure 3. Panel ratings for the importance of identifying neuropathic pain in a person with spine-related leg pain.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4. Panel ratings on the likely presence of neuropathic pain in various presentations of spine-related leg pain (6-point Likert scale from definitely to unsure).
Figure 4. Panel ratings on the likely presence of neuropathic pain in various presentations of spine-related leg pain (6-point Likert scale from definitely to unsure).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5. Flow chart of the panel recommendations on adaptations of the grading system for neuropathic pain in people with spine-related leg pain. Adaptations are highlighted in purple colour. Further clarification is provided in the text following each recommendation.
Figure 5. Flow chart of the panel recommendations on adaptations of the grading system for neuropathic pain in people with spine-related leg pain. Adaptations are highlighted in purple colour. Further clarification is provided in the text following each recommendation.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 76 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lasegue, 1864, Considerations sur la sciatique, Arch Gen Med, 558

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schmid, A. B., Tampin, B., Baron, R., Finnerup, N. B., Hansson, P., Hietaharju, A., Konstantinou, K., Lin, C.-W. C., Markman, J., Price, C., Smith, B. H., & Slater, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • Tampere University (FI)
  • Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • University of Dundee (GB)
Corresponding author
Schmid, Annina B.
Venue
Pain
Published
2023-05-25
Volume
164
Issue
8
Pages
1693-1704
ISSN
  • 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
  • 1872-6623
OpenAlex
W4378373890
Cited by
51
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5
FWCI
9.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Library Osnabrück University (Hochschule Osnabrück) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • International Association for the Study of Pain
  • Wellcome Trust (222101, 222101/Z/20/Z)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Lundbeckfonden (R359-2020 2620)
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
sciatica, neuropathic pain, radicular pain, radiculopathy, pain terminology, diagnostic classification
MeSH terms
Humans, Leg, Neuralgia, Quality of Life, Radiculopathy, Sciatica

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review