The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of Canine-Assisted Ambulation on Hospitalized Chronic Heart Failure Patients' Ambulation Outcomes and Satisfaction: A Pilot Study
Abstract
Background and research objective Chronic heart failure (HF) is a prevalent and costly disease process. Early ambulation has been shown to have a positive impact on patient outcomes and length of stay. Animal-assisted therapy is a novel modality that has shown to be a safe and effective adjunct to a number of traditional treatment plans. This study sought to synergistically combine ambulation and animal-assisted therapy by using canine-assisted ambulation (CAA) to improve the ambulation outcomes of HF patients. Subjects and methods Sixty-nine hospitalized patients with a primary diagnosis of HF were approached to ambulate with a restorative aide. After recording their initial response, they were given the opportunity to participate in CAA (walking with a therapy dog). Initial ambulation refusal rate was compared with a historical population of 537 HF patients. Distance ambulated was recorded using a pedometer and compared with a randomly selected, 64-patient sample from the historical HF patient population, stratified by day of hospital stay. Patient satisfaction was assessed through a 5-item Likert scale survey. Results and conclusion The 537-patient historical HF population had an ambulation refusal rate of 28%. When offered the chance to participate in CAA, only 7.2% of the study population refused ambulation (P = .0002). Of the 69-patient study sample, 13 initially refused ambulation then agreed when offered CAA (P = .0009). Distance ambulated increased from 120.2 steps i…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In an ambulation training program, 69 in-patients with congestive heart failure who walked with a dog and trainer walked twice as far as a historical sample (mean 230.07 steps/day versus 120.2 steps/day, P < .0001).
“When matched with a “historical sample” of congestive heart failure patients, subjects who walked with a dog walked twice as far as the “historical sample” (mean 230.07 steps/day versus 120.2 steps/day, P < .0001).”
From The Benefit of Pets and Animal-Assisted Therapy to the Health of Older Individuals (2014) · cites this paper as [55]
Citations
Cites
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971
Randomised Controlled Trial of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Elderly Patients with Heart Failure
Austin, J., Williams, R., Ross, L., Moseley, L., & Hutchison, S. (2005) · European Journal of Heart Failure · doi:10.1016/j.ejheart.2004.10.004 · Cited by 251
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Brodie, 2004, Motivational interviewing to promote physical activity for people with chronic heart failure., J Adv Nurs, 50, 518, 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03422.x · DOI
- Kalisch, 2006, Missed nursing care: a qualitative study., J Nurs Care Qual, 21, 306, 10.1097/00001786-200610000-00006 · DOI
- Morris, 2007, Moving our critically ill patients: mobility barriers and benefits., Crit Care Clin, 23, 1, 10.1016/j.ccc.2006.11.003 · DOI
- Mullett, 2008, A helping paw: animal assisted therapy., RN, 71, 39
- Stanley-Hermanns, 2002, Animal assisted therapy., Am J Nurs, 102, 69, 10.1097/00000446-200210000-00028 · DOI
- Cole, 2007, Animal assisted therapy in patients hospitalized with heart failure., Am J Crit Care, 16, 575, 10.4037/ajcc2007.16.6.575 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Animal assisted intervention: A systematic review of benefits and risks
Bert, F., Gualano, M. R., Camussi, E., Pieve, G., Voglino, G., & Siliquini, R. (2016) · European Journal of Integrative Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2016.05.005 · Cited by 227
The Benefit of Pets and Animal-Assisted Therapy to the Health of Older Individuals
Cherniack, E. P., & Cherniack, A. R. (2014) · Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research · doi:10.1155/2014/623203 · Cited by 159
Animals in Healthcare Facilities: Recommendations to Minimize Potential Risks
Murthy, R., Bearman, G., Brown, S., Bryant, K., Chinn, R., Hewlett, A., George, B. G., Goldstein, E. J. C., Holzmann-Pazgal, G., Rupp, M. E., et al. (2015) · Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1017/ice.2015.15 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Abate, S. V., Zucconi, M., & Boxer, B. A.
- Corresponding author
- Abate, Samantha V.
- Venue
- Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 224-230
- ISSN
- 0889-4655 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2321348973
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- animal-assisted therapy, chronic heart failure, early mobilization, hospitalized patients, walking distance, patient satisfaction, length of hospital stay
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Animals, Chronic Disease, Dogs, Female, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New Jersey, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Walking, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Animal Assisted Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review