Cited by 18Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceChild Abuse and Trauma

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring How Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners Practise Trauma-Informed Care

Open access
Poldon, Suzanne, Duhn, Lenora, Camargo Plazas, Pilar, Purkey, Eva, Tranmer, Joan·2021·Journal of Forensic Nursing

Abstract

Background: Sexual violence is a term describing sexual acts where consent is not freely given. Registered nurses employed as sexual assault nurse examiners (SANEs) provide care to address the medical and legal needs of victims/survivors of sexual violence. Trauma-informed care (TIC) is an approach recommended when caring for individuals who have experienced trauma. Purpose: The study purpose was to understand how SANEs incorporate trauma-informed approaches in the care of adult and postpubescent adolescent victims/survivors of sexual violence. Methods: Eight SANEs were purposively recruited to participate in online semistructured interviews. Interview data were analyzed using qualitative interpretive description. Results: Six themes emerged from the analysis: (a) the importance of understanding the patient's experience; (b) personalized connection: developing a safe nurse–patient relationship; (c) choice: the framework of how we do things; (d) rebuilding strengths and skills to support healing and posttraumatic growth; (e) a wonderful way to practise: facilitators and benefits of trauma-informed practice; and (f) challenges to trauma-informed practice. Conclusions: These findings indicate the perceived value of TIC and the need for enhanced support of providers who deliver TIC. More research is warranted to strengthen the evidence about trauma-informed practice in SANE programs and across healthcare settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jfn.0000000000000338

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Poldon, S., Duhn, L., Camargo Plazas, P., Purkey, E., & Tranmer, J.
Affiliations
  • Author Affiliations:School of Nursing
  • Queen's University (CA)
Corresponding author
Duhn, Lenora
Venue
Journal of Forensic Nursing
Published
2021-10
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
235-243
ISSN
  • 1556-3693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-3938
OpenAlex
W3203084208
Cited by
17
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Journal of Forensic Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QSpace (Queen's University Library) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
sexual assault nurse examiners, trauma-informed care, sexual violence, sexual assault survivors, nurse-patient relationship, posttraumatic growth, strengths-based care, forensic nursing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Humans, Nurse-Patient Relations, Nurses, Sex Offenses, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review