Cited by 72Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentSchizophrenia research and treatmentPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Prescription Patterns of Psychotropic Medications in Elderly Compared With Younger Participants Who Achieved a “Recovered” Status in the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder

Open access
Al Jurdi, Rayan K., Marangell, Lauren B., Petersen, Nancy J., Martinez, Melissa, Gyulai, Laszlo, Sajatovic, Martha·2008·The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives This study compares prescription patterns between young adults and elderly with bipolar disorder who achieved a recovery status during the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD).Design STEP-BD is a multicenter National Institute of Mental Health-funded project designed to evaluate the longitudinal outcome of patients with bipolar disorder. The STEP-BD study involved extensive assessment across multiple domains including demographic data, diagnosis, symptom severity, treatment, and clinical status. Patients achieved "recovered" status when they experienced eight consecutive weeks without significant symptoms.Participants The authors analyzed data of all subjects who achieved a recovered status at least once in their participation.Measurements The authors compared treatment regimes and doses among young participants with middle age (N = 3,364), 20-59 years old, and older participants 60 and above (N = 246).Results Of the 3,615 STEP-BD participants who had a lifetime diagnosis of bipolar subtypes I or II, 67.6% (N = 2442) achieved a recovered status during their participation. A total of 78.5% (N = 193) of older patients recovered compared with 66.8% of the younger cohort. On average, participants who reached a recovered status took 2.05 medications with no difference between age groups. Lithium was prescribed to 37.8% of younger patients compared with only 29.5% of older participants. The mean dosages taken by younger and older patients differed significantly only for lithium, valproate, and risperidone with elderly individuals prescribed lower daily dosages. Significant reduction in lithium dosing was observed among individuals aged 50 and older and among individuals 60 and older for valproate. Although valproate was more often prescribed, 42.1% of recovered bipolar elder achieved recovery with lithium alone compared with only 21.3% of the younger cohort.Conclusion This data shows recovery is achievable in the elderly though more than one medication is often needed regardless of age.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jgp.0b013e318187135f

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]First MB Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders-clinician version (SCID-CV) Washington (DC) American Psychiatric Press 1997

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al Jurdi, R. K., Marangell, L. B., Petersen, N. J., Martinez, M., Gyulai, L., & Sajatovic, M.
Affiliations
  • Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-11
Volume
16
Issue
11
Pages
922-933
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975129134
Cited by
72
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01mh80001-12-0-0)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (N01 MH080001)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
bipolar disorder, older adults, psychotropic drugs, prescribing patterns, recovery, lithium, valproic acid, risperidone, drug dosing, age differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Antidepressive Agents, Bipolar Disorder, Drug Utilization, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotropic Drugs, United States, Valproic Acid, Treatment Outcome, Lithium Compounds, Antimanic Agents, Prescriptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review