Cited by 57

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Barriers to At-Home-Preparedness in Public Health Employees: Implications for Disaster Preparedness Training

Blessman, James, Skupski, James, Jamil, Mada, Jamil, Hikmet, Bassett, David, Wabeke, Roger, Arnetz, Bengt·2007·Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine

Abstract

Objectives To assess "at-home" preparedness and barriers to preparedness in a cohort of public health employees. Method Conducted a cross-sectional survey involving 100 employees attending emergency preparedness training that emphasized incident command training and included a segment on "at-home" preparedness. Results Fifteen percent of participants were rated as "better prepared," and only 8% of participants would be considered "most prepared." There was no relationship between the concern for bioterrorism and other disasters and preparedness. The principal barrier involved challenges in getting the task done versus lack of desire or knowledge. Conclusions There is great potential for distraction of public health workers during an emergent event if they are not prepared at home and have concern for family members. At-home preparedness training efforts that emphasize what should be done and why are likely to have limited impact on changing behavior. Strategies that ensure that small steps are taken are likely to be more successful.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jom.0b013e31803225c7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Boulton, 2005, Terrorism and emergency preparedness in state and territorial public health departments—United States, 2004., MMWR, 54, 459
  2. Fitzpatrick, 2000, Survey of chief livestock officials regarding bioterrorism preparedness in the United States., J Am Vet Med Assoc, 217, 1315, 10.2460/javma.2000.217.1315 · DOI
  3. Graham, 2006, Mass-casualty events at schools: a national preparedness survey., Pediatrics, 117, e8, 10.1542/peds.2005-0927 · DOI
  4. Hall, 2002, Preparing for bioterrorism at the state level: report of an informal survey., Am J Orthopsychiatry, 72, 486, 10.1037/0002-9432.72.4.486 · DOI
  5. Hart, 2002, Keyword: help! Online resources for disaster preparedness., Caring, 21, 32
  6. Olympia, 2005, The preparedness of schools to respond to emergencies in children: a national survey of school nurses., Pediatrics, 116, e738, 10.1542/peds.2005-1474 · DOI
  7. Beaton, 2002, Instrument development and evaluation of domestic preparedness training for first responders., Prehospital Disaster Med, 17, 119, 10.1017/S1049023X00000339 · DOI
  8. Gildea, 2005, Vertical evacuation simulation of critically ill patients in a hospital., Prehospital Disaster Med, 20, 243, 10.1017/S1049023X00002600 · DOI
  9. Estrada, 2005, Partnering for preparedness: the project public health ready experience., Public Health Rep, 120, 69, 10.1177/00333549051200S114 · DOI
  10. Foldy, 2004, The public health dashboard: a surveillance model for bioterrorism preparedness., J Public Health Manag Pract, 10, 234, 10.1097/00124784-200405000-00007 · DOI
  11. Gebbie, 2002, Public health worker competencies for emergency response., J Public Health Manag Pract, 8, 73, 10.1097/00124784-200205000-00011 · DOI
  12. Hsu, 2006, Healthcare worker competencies for disaster training., BMC Med Educ, 6, 19, 10.1186/1472-6920-6-19 · DOI
  13. O’Neill, 2005, The ABC’s of disaster response., Scand J Surg, 94, 259, 10.1177/145749690509400403 · DOI
  14. Perry, 2003, Preparedness for emergency response: guidelines for the emergency planning process., Disasters, 27, 336, 10.1111/j.0361-3666.2003.00237.x · DOI
  15. Prezant, 2005, Effects of the August 2003 blackout on the New York City healthcare delivery system: a lesson for disaster preparedness., Crit Care Med, 33, S96, 10.1097/01.CCM.0000150956.90030.23 · DOI
  16. Eisenman, 2006, Differences in individual-level terrorism preparedness in Los Angeles County., Am J Prev Med, 30, 1, 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.001 · DOI
  17. Franco, 2006, Reports on Katrina highlight weaknesses in U.S. disaster preparedness and response., Biosecur Bioterror, 4, 97
  18. Mair, 2005, Highlights and happenings: response to Hurricane Katrina exposes emergency preparedness problems., Biosecur Bioterror, 3, 275, 10.1089/bsp.2005.3.275 · DOI
  19. Qureshi, 2005, Health care workers’ ability and willingness to report to duty during catastrophic disasters., J Urban Health, 82, 378, 10.1093/jurban/jti086 · DOI
  20. Prochaska, 1992, Stages of change in the modification of problem behaviors., Prog Behav Modif, 28, 183
  21. Dooley, 1992, Earthquake preparedness: predictors in a community survey., J Appl Soc Psychol, 22, 451, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00984.x · DOI
  22. Motoyoshi, 2004, [Determinant factors of community-based disaster preparedness: a case study of flood prone area]., Shinrigaku Kenkyu, 75, 72, 10.4992/jjpsy.75.72 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Blessman, J., Skupski, J., Jamil, M., Jamil, H., Bassett, D., Wabeke, R., & Arnetz, B.
Venue
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Published
2007-03
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
318-326
ISSN
1076-2752
Cited by
57
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Barriers to At-Home-Preparedness in Public Health Employees: Implications for Disaster Preparedness Training. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/jom.0b013e31803225c7
The paper
Blessman, J., Skupski, J., Jamil, M., Jamil, H., Bassett, D., Wabeke, R., & Arnetz, B. (2007). Barriers to At-Home-Preparedness in Public Health Employees: Implications for Disaster Preparedness Training. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0b013e31803225c7