The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Practical Measure of Workplace Resilience: Developing the Resilience at Work Scale
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop an effective measure of resilience at work for use in individual work-related performance and emotional distress contexts. METHODS: Two separate cross-sectional studies investigated: (1) exploratory factor analysis of 45 items putatively underpinning workplace resilience among 397 participants and (2) confirmatory factor analysis of resilience measure derived from Study 1 demonstrating a credible model of interaction, with performance outcome variables among 194 participants. RESULTS: A 20-item scale explaining 67% of variance, measuring seven aspects of workplace resilience, which are teachable and capable of conscious development, was achieved. A credible model of relationships with work engagement, sleep, stress recovery, and physical health was demonstrated in the expected directions. CONCLUSION: The new scale shows considerable promise as a reliable instrument for use in the area of employee support and development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)
Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.10113 · Cited by 11,793
Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development.
Masten, A. S. (2001) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.56.3.227 · Cited by 8,497
The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire: A Cross-National Study
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164405282471 · Cited by 7,403
Essential role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in adult hippocampal function
Monteggia, L. M., Barrot, M., Powell, C. M., Berton, O., Galanis, V., Gemelli, T., Meuth, S., Nagy, A., Greene, R. W., & Nestler, E. J. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0402141101 · Cited by 685
Assessing the economic impact of stress[mdash ]The modern day hidden epidemic
Kalia, M. (2002) · Metabolism · doi:10.1053/meta.2002.33193 · Cited by 243
Neuroimaging studies in post-traumatic stress disorder
Bremner, J. D. (2002) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-996-0044-9 · Cited by 194
Cited by
Resilience in the Workplace: A Multilevel Review and Synthesis
Hartmann, S., Weiss, M., Newman, A., & Hoegl, M. (2020) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12191 · Cited by 521
Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare professionals
Kunzler, A. M., Helmreich, I., Chmitorz, A., König, J., Binder, H., Wessa, M., & Lieb, K. (2020) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd012527.pub2 · Cited by 390
Psychological interventions for resilience enhancement in adults
Helmreich, I., Kunzler, A., Chmitorz, A., König, J., Binder, H., Wessa, M., & Lieb, K. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd012527 · Cited by 223
Metadata
- Authors
- Winwood, P. C., Colon, R., & McEwen, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1205-1212
- ISSN
- 1076-2752 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168084920
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 4.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Practical Measure of Workplace Resilience: Developing the Resilience at Work Scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/jom.0b013e3182a2a60a
- The paper
- Winwood, P. C., Colon, R., & McEwen, K. (2013). A Practical Measure of Workplace Resilience: Developing the Resilience at Work Scale. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0b013e3182a2a60a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
