Cited by 22Diabetes Management and EducationTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationChronic Disease Management Strategies

Diabetes management among underserved older adults through telemedicine and community health workers

Marsh, Zyrene, Nguyen, Yen, Teegala, Yamini, Cotter, Valerie T.·2022·Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners

Abstract

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) disproportionately affects older adults from marginalized communities. In the United States, the prevalence of DM in ages ≥65 years is twofold higher than the national average for adult populations. Telemedicine and community health workers (CHWs) are emerging diabetes care models but their impact on older adults with limited resources are relatively neglected within the medical literature. Objectives: The purpose of this systematic review was to explore the impact of telemedicine and CHW interventions for improving A1C levels and self-management behaviors among underserved older adults with DM. Data sources: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane databases using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses as a reporting guideline. Conclusions: Diabetes self-management education (DSME) administered through telemedicine and CHW interventions were effective for improving A1C levels, self-care adherence, and patient and provider satisfaction among adults aged ≥50 years. Common barriers to diabetes care include inadequate resources, lack of transportation, inconsistent means of communications, social isolation, and low motivation. Community health workers and telemedicine were effective in improving disease management and optimizing care coordination within the vulnerable adult populations. Implications for practice: Well-coordinated, evidence-based, and population-centered interventions can overcome the unique disparities experienced by underserved older adults with diabetes. Incorporating DSME-guided telemedicine and CHW interventions into primary care can mitigate diabetes-related complications in older populations. The lack of evidence specific to adults aged ≥65 years calls for a universally accepted age range when referring to older adults in future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jxx.0000000000000595

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marsh, Z., Nguyen, Y., Teegala, Y., & Cotter, V. T.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Rocking Horse Community Health Center (RHCHC), Springfield, Ohio
Corresponding author
Marsh, Zyrene
Venue
Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners
Published
2021-04-07
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
26-31
ISSN
  • 2327-6886 (ISSN-L)
  • 2327-6924
OpenAlex
W3155458844
Cited by
22
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, older adults, underserved populations, telemedicine, community health workers, diabetes self-management education, HbA1c, self-care adherence, health disparities, care coordination, barriers to diabetes care, social isolation, transportation barriers
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Aged, Community Health Workers, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Primary Health Care, United States, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review