Cited by 211Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Cuffless Blood Pressure Measurement Devices: Challenges and Proposals

Open access
Mukkamala, Ramakrishna, Yavarimanesh, Mohammad, Natarajan, Keerthana, Hahn, Jin-Oh, Kyriakoulis, Konstantinos G., Avolio, Alberto P., Stergiou, George S.·2021·Hypertension

Abstract

Several novel cuffless wearable devices and smartphone applications claiming that they can measure blood pressure (BP) are appearing on the market. These technologies are very attractive and promising, with increasing interest among health care professionals for their potential use. Moreover, they are becoming popular among patients with hypertension and healthy people. However, at the present time, there are serious issues about BP measurement accuracy of cuffless devices and the 2021 European Society of Hypertension Guidelines on BP measurement do not recommend them for clinical use. Cuffless devices have special validation issues, which have been recently recognized. It is important to note that the 2018 Universal Standard for the validation of automated BP measurement devices developed by the American Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, the European Society of Hypertension, and the International Organization for Standardization is inappropriate for the validation of cuffless devices. Unfortunately, there is an increasing number of publications presenting data on the accuracy of novel cuffless BP measurement devices, with inadequate methodology and potentially misleading conclusions. The objective of this review is to facilitate understanding of the capabilities and limitations of emerging cuffless BP measurement devices. First, the potential and the types of these devices are described. Then, the unique challenges in evaluating the BP measurement accuracy of cuffless devices are explained. Studies from the literature and computer simulations are employed to illustrate these challenges. Finally, proposals are given on how to evaluate cuffless devices including presenting and interpreting relevant study results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hypertensionaha.121.17747

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cuffless devices have accuracy problems not seen in automated cuff devices, including the need for individual calibration and questionable accuracy in tracking BP changes after calibration.

    “However, cuffless devices have specific accuracy issues that are not present in the automated cuff BP devices, such as the need for individual user calibration and their questionable accuracy in tracking BP changes after calibration55,56.”

    From Blood pressure and its variability: classic and novel measurement techniques (2022) · cites this paper as [55]

    The Types of Cuffless BP Measurement Devices section says cuff-calibrated devices require calibration for an individual, but calibration-free devices do not. The Critical Review section says the accuracy of cuff-calibrated devices in tracking BP changes within an individual often remains unclear. Thus the tracking concern is supported, while the need for individual calibration does not apply to cuffless devices generally; page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cuffless devices can provide detailed information about true BP profile and behaviour over time and about all types of BP variability.

    “Therefore, these devices can provide detailed information on true BP profile and behaviour over time, as well as all types of BPV (including short-term to long-term BPV6,55–57), and have great potential for use in screening, early diagnosis, close monitoring and optimal management of hypertension.”

    From Blood pressure and its variability: classic and novel measurement techniques (2022) · cites this paper as [55]

    The Potential of Cuffless Blood Pressure Measurement Devices section says these devices could provide a complete evaluation of BP level and behavior across daily circumstances and long periods. But the Critical Review of Data Presentation in Recent Studies cautions that their accuracy in tracking short- or long-term BP changes within an individual often remains unclear. The source therefore supports the potential for detailed monitoring, not the unqualified claim that cuffless devices can characterize all types of BP variability. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cuffless BP technologies in wearables and smartphones can take multiple or continuous measurements during routine activities over days, weeks or months without cuff-induced limb compression.

    “Cuffless BP technologies embedded in wearable devices and smartphones can obtain multiple or even continuous measurements during routine activities for days, weeks or months, without the discomfort of cuff-induced limb compression.”

    From Blood pressure and its variability: classic and novel measurement techniques (2022) · cites this paper as [55]

    “The Potential of Cuffless Blood Pressure Measurement Devices” (page unavailable) describes numerous measurements from wearables and smartphones across daily circumstances and long periods. It does not establish continuous measurement for months or discuss discomfort from limb compression; “Types of Cuffless BP Measurement Devices” (page unavailable) also notes that some devices require periodic arm-cuff calibration. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most cuffless BP devices require initial calibration for each user and periodic recalibration over time.

    “Most of these devices require initial calibration in each user, which is usually performed by inputting a BP value measured using an upper-arm-cuff device or by inputting simple demographic data that are known to correlate with BP level (such as age and sex), with periodic recalibration required over time (every few hours, days or weeks).”

    From Blood pressure and its variability: classic and novel measurement techniques (2022) · cites this paper as [55]

    The “Types of Cuffless BP Measurement Devices” section says cuff-calibrated devices require periodic arm-cuff measurements, with intervals ranging from hours to weeks. It also identifies calibration-free devices that do not require calibration for each user, and does not establish that most devices require it. The “Simulation study” section treats demographic input as a feature of some calibration-free devices, not as periodic recalibration. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cuffless BP devices use various parameters and techniques and have different intended uses.

    “These devices use several different parameters and techniques to assess BP levels, including pulse transit time, pulse wave analysis, photoplethysmography and applanation tonometry, and have different intended uses (such as wearable devices for occasional use or for short-term continuous monitoring in an intensive care unit)55,56.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [27]IEEE Standard Association, “ IEEE 1708a-2019 - IEEE Standard for Wearable, Cuffless Blood Pressure Measuring Devices - Amendment 1,” IEEE Std, 2019. https://standards.ieee.org/standard/1708a-2019.html. Accessed May 24, 2021.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mukkamala, R., Yavarimanesh, M., Natarajan, K., Hahn, J.-O., Kyriakoulis, K. G., Avolio, A. P., & Stergiou, G. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Macquarie University (AU)
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2021-11
Volume
78
Issue
5
Pages
1161-1167
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W3200345925
Cited by
211
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL146470)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (U01EB018818)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
cuffless blood pressure measurement, measurement accuracy
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Humans, Hypertension, Self Care, Sensitivity and Specificity, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Reproducibility of Results, Pulse Wave Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review