Cited by 12Cardiac Arrest and ResuscitationRespiratory Support and MechanismsPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Monitor the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 2020

Open access
Genbrugge, Cornelia, Eertmans, Ward, Salcido, David D.·2020·Current Opinion in Critical Care

Abstract

Purpose of review: The current review will give an overview of different possibilities to monitor quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) from a physiologic and a process point of view and how these two approaches can/should overlap. Recent findings: Technology is evolving fast with a lot of opportunities to improve the CPR quality. The role of smartphones and wearables are step-by-step identified as also the possibilities to perform patient tailored CPR based on physiologic parameters. The first steps have been taken, but more are to be expected. In this context, the limits of what is possible with human providers will become more and more clear. Summary: To perform high-quality CPR, at first, one should optimize rate, depth and pause duration supported by process monitoring tools. Second, the evolving technological evolution gives opportunities to measure physiologic parameters in real-time which will open the way for patient-tailored CPR. The role of ultrasound, cerebral saturation and end-tidal CO 2 in measuring the quality of CPR needs to be further investigated as well as the possible ways of influencing these measured parameters to improve neurological outcome and survival.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mcc.0000000000000726

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wearables are applied in diverse fields of health.

    “Apart from these 2 examples, wearables are applied in diverse fields of health, including acoustic, gastrointestinal sensors for ileus prediction [18]; UV sun exposure [19]; heat-related illness measurements [20]; electrolyte monitoring, for example, for cystic fibrosis or training management [21,22]; early warning of AF with a wearable ring [23]; generation of electrocardiograms (ECGs) [15];”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Genbrugge, C., Eertmans, W., & Salcido, D. D.
Affiliations
  • Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE)
  • Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (BE)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Genbrugge, Cornelia
Venue
Current Opinion in Critical Care
Published
2020-06
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
219-227
ISSN
  • 1070-5295 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-7072
OpenAlex
W3018631288
Cited by
12
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Critical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
cardiopulmonary resuscitation, CPR quality monitoring, process monitoring, physiological monitoring, wearable devices, end-tidal carbon dioxide, cerebral oxygen saturation, ultrasound, neurological outcome, survival
MeSH terms
Heart Arrest, Humans, Monitoring, Physiologic, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review