The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Durable Alteration of the Colonic Microbiota by the Administration of Donor Fecal Flora
Abstract
GOALS: To determine whether fecal bacteriotherapy results in a durable beneficial change in the colonic microbiota of patients with flora-related disorders. BACKGROUND: Earlier studies have implicated the colonic microbiota in a number of conditions. Administration of a fecal suspension from a healthy individual to an ill individual (fecal bacteriotherapy) can cure Clostridium difficile infection and potentially other diseases. Oral probiotics do not work in this condition, yet there has been no study to determine whether fecal bacteriotherapy results in prolonged implantation. STUDY: Fecal samples were collected from 10 patients undergoing fecal bacteriotherapy. Patients completed an antibiotic schedule and bowel lavage before the infusion of healthy donor feces. Using a molecular approach, the bacterial populations in patient fecal samples were followed from pretreatment to 24 weeks post-initial infusion and compared with the initial infused donor fecal suspension. RESULTS: At intervals of 4, 8, and 24 weeks after the procedure, the bacterial populations in the patients' fecal samples consisted predominantly of bacteria derived from the healthy donor samples. Comparisons of similarity at 4, 8, and 24 week samples to the donor-infused sample were made and each recipient's baseline sample was statistically significant with Friedman test. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a durable beneficial change in the patients' bacterial populations of the colon to represent those of the healthy donor's microbiota. Manipulation of the colonic microbiota to improve its protective and beneficial role represents a promising field of new therapeutic strategies for the treatment of gastrointestinal conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vollaard, E. J., & Clasener, H. A. (1994) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.38.3.409 · Cited by 478
Kim, H. J., Camilleri, M., Mckinzie, S., Lempke, M. B., Burton, D. D., Thomforde, G. M., & Zinsmeister, A. R. (2003) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01543.x · Cited by 468
Sen, S., Mullan, M. M., Parker, T. J., Woolner, J. T., Tarry, S. A., & Hunter, J. O. (2002) · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · doi:10.1023/a:1020597001460 · Cited by 245
Cited by
Unravelling the effects of the environment and host genotype on the gut microbiome
Spor, A., Koren, O., & Ley, R. (2011) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2540 · Cited by 1,509
Kang, D.-W., Adams, J. B., Gregory, A. C., Borody, T., Chittick, L., Fasano, A., Khoruts, A., Geis, E., Maldonado, J., McDonough-Means, S., et al. (2017) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-016-0225-7 · Cited by 1,391
Self-citationUrsell, L. K., Metcalf, J. L., Parfrey, L. W., & Knight, R. (2012) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.2012.00493.x · Cited by 1,255
Gough, E., Shaikh, H., & Manges, A. R. (2011) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cir632 · Cited by 1,003
Kassam, Z., Lee, C. H., Yuan, Y., & Hunt, R. H. (2013) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2013.59 · Cited by 904
Metadata
- Authors
- Grehan, M. J., Borody, T. J., Leis, S. M., Campbell, J., Mitchell, H., & Wettstein, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 551-561
- ISSN
- 0192-0790 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006199855
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Durable Alteration of the Colonic Microbiota by the Administration of Donor Fecal Flora. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/mcg.0b013e3181e5d06b
- The paper
- Grehan, M. J., Borody, T. J., Leis, S. M., Campbell, J., Mitchell, H., & Wettstein, A. (2010). Durable Alteration of the Colonic Microbiota by the Administration of Donor Fecal Flora. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1097/mcg.0b013e3181e5d06b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.