Cited by 1,255Gut microbiota and healthMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyOral microbiology and periodontitis research

Defining the human microbiome

Open access
Ursell, Luke K, Metcalf, Jessica L, Parfrey, Laura Wegener, Knight, Rob·2012·Nutrition Reviews

Abstract

Rapidly developing sequencing methods and analytical techniques are enhancing our ability to understand the human microbiome, and, indeed, how the microbiome and its constituents are defined. This review highlights recent research that expands our ability to understand the human microbiome on different spatial and temporal scales, including daily time series datasets spanning months. Furthermore, emerging concepts related to defining operational taxonomic units, diversity indices, core versus transient microbiomes, and the possibility of enterotypes are discussed. Additional advances in sequencing technology and in our understanding of the microbiome will provide exciting prospects for exploiting the microbiota for personalized medicine.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2012.00493.x

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In humans, the microbiota of infants was similar to the vaginal microbiota of their mother after natural birth but mimicked the skin microbiota when caesarean section was performed.

    “In humans, studies have shown that the microbiota of infants was similar to the vaginal microbiota of their mother after natural birth but mimicked the skin microbiota when caesarean section was performed (Cho and Blaser, 2012; Ursell et al., 2012).”
  • The human microbiota is the collective term for the trillions of microorganisms that live in and on us.

    “The human microbiota is the collective term for the trillions of microorganisms that live in and on us (Ursell et al., 2012)”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Ursell et al., 2012

  • Microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract play a role in nutrient uptake, vitamin synthesis, energy harvest, inflammatory modulation, and host immune response.

    “The microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract play a significant role in nutrient uptake, vitamin synthesis, energy harvest, inflammatory modulation, and host immune response, collectively contributing to human health.”

    From The athletic gut microbiota (2020) · cites this paper as [4]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [6]van Leeuwenhoek A An abstract of a Letter from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, Sep. 12, 1683. About Animals in the scrurf of the Teeth Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 1684 14 568 574
  2. [60]Dethlefsen L Huse S Sogin ML Relman DA The pervasive effects of an antibiotic on the human gut microbiota, as revealed by deep 16S rRNA sequencing Plos Biology 2008 6 e280 19018661 PMC2586385
  3. [62]Jernberg C Lofmark S Edlund C Jansson JK Long-term ecological impacts of antibiotic administration on the human intestinal microbiota Isme Journal 2007 1 56 66 18043614

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ursell, L. K., Metcalf, J. L., Parfrey, L. W., & Knight, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Knight, Rob
Venue
Nutrition Reviews
Published
2012-08
Volume
70
Pages
S38-S44
ISSN
0029-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2156591001
Cited by
1,255
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 129 · 2024: 212 · 2023: 158 · 2022: 164 · 2021: 126 · 2020: 120 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrition Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG004872, HG4872)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM008759, T32GM142607)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Keywords
human microbiome, microbiota, operational taxonomic units, diversity indices, core microbiome, enterotypes, spatial and temporal scales, personalized medicine, sequencing technologies
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Humans, Phylogeny, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Sequence Analysis, Gastrointestinal Tract, Biodiversity, Metagenome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review