Cited by 33Diabetes Treatment and ManagementPancreatic function and diabetesMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Dietary protein and blood glucose control

Azzout-Marniche, Dalila, Gaudichon, Claire, Tomé, Daniel·2014·Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review presents the different pathways by which protein and amino acid impact glucose control. The review more particularly discusses the contradictory effects reported in the literature on the involvement of amino acid on glucose production and in insulin secretion and sensitivity. RECENT FINDINGS: Some recent findings allow a better understanding of the direct and indirect mechanisms involved in the insulinotropic activity of some amino acids in pancreatic β-cell and in the production of glucose through liver gluconeogenesis that participates to improve the control of glycemia. In contrast, the potential deleterious effects of branched chain amino acid, and particularly leucine, hypothesized in previous publications, have been discussed in some recent publications. SUMMARY: These processes are of high clinical relevance since the role of protein and amino acid have been repeatedly discussed to improve insulin secretion in type 2 diabetes patients or in weight management strategy in overweight and obese individuals. In addition, whether blood amino acid could be used as biomarkers for the risk of type 2 diabetes needs to be discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mco.0000000000000062

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Azzout-Marniche, D., Gaudichon, C., & Tomé, D.
Affiliations
AgroParisTech (FR)
Corresponding author
Tomé, Daniel
Venue
Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care
Published
2014-07
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
349-354
ISSN
1363-1950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2315086332
Cited by
33
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
dietary protein, amino acids, glycemic control, insulin secretion, insulin sensitivity, gluconeogenesis, pancreatic beta cells, branched-chain amino acids, leucine, type 2 diabetes, obesity, weight management, amino acid biomarkers
MeSH terms
Amino Acids, Animals, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Dietary Proteins, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Insulin, Postprandial Period, Insulin-Secreting Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review