Cited by 36Nutrition and Health in AgingDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementMuscle Physiology and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity in chronic kidney disease: update on prevalence, outcomes, risk factors and nutrition treatment

Barreto Silva, Maria Inês, Picard, Kelly, Klein, Márcia Regina Simas Torres·2022·Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes literature from the last 18 months reporting on sarcopenia (or its components) in chronic kidney disease (CKD). RECENT FINDINGS: The prevalence of sarcopenia in CKD is reported to be 5-62.5%, with higher rates observed later in the disease. Sarcopenic obesity rates are reported to be 2-23%. Sarcopenia in CKD is associated with increased risk of mortality, cardiovascular disease and vascular calcification. Risk factors include kidney disease itself and the impacts of CKD on lifestyle (reduced physical activity, diet changes). In earlier stages of CKD, if the risks from sarcopenia outweigh the risk of reaching end-stage renal disease, ensuring adequate energy intake combined with modest protein liberalization and physical activity may be indicated. Protein intakes above 1.3 g/kg of body weight per day should be avoided. For dialysis patients, interventions that provide a combination of carbohydrate, protein and fat appear more effective than those that provide protein alone, though it may take as long as 48 weeks for detectable changes in muscle mass. SUMMARY: Sarcopenia is prevalent in CKD as kidney disease significantly impacts muscle mass and function. Nutrition interventions can improve components of sarcopenia, with an emphasis on adequate energy and protein.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mco.0000000000000871

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Barreto Silva, M. I., Picard, K., & Klein, M. R. S. T.
Affiliations
  • Human Nutrition Research Unit, Division of Human Nutrition, Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Venue
Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care
Published
2022-08-30
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
371-377
ISSN
  • 1363-1950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-6519
OpenAlex
W4293568629
Cited by
36
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, chronic kidney disease, prevalence, mortality, cardiovascular disease, vascular calcification, risk factors, protein intake, energy intake, physical activity, dialysis, nutrition interventions, muscle mass
MeSH terms
Carbohydrates, Humans, Obesity, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Sarcopenia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review