Cited by 40Medication Adherence and ComplianceAsthma and respiratory diseasesPharmacy and Medical Practices

Improving adherence to asthma medications: current knowledge and future perspectives

Blake, Kathryn V.·2017·Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Poor adherence to asthma controller medications, particularly inhaled corticosteroids, has been well known for decades and is a major cause of uncontrolled asthma and increased healthcare utilization. This review presents recent evidence on factors leading to nonadherence in specific age groups, parents of young children, adolescents and young adults, adults, and the elderly. Novel management strategies including electronic sensors with associated smart phone applications for adherence improvement are discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: Interventions to promote adherence must include a focus on issues important to the patient. Parents are concerned about adverse effects and the difficulty of medication administration in their child; adolescents and young adults need help with organizational skills and social barriers; adults may be more receptive to the need for daily medication after an acute exacerbation and acceptance of their disease; the elderly may have medication misuse issues associated with cognitive decline and other comorbidities related to aging. In all age groups, a trusting relationship with the provider is the key. New digital devices to track adherence may provide feedback to the patient and provider to evaluate and to promote adherence. SUMMARY: Personalized approaches are required to address adherence barriers in target populations. Research on specific needs and barriers in target populations and development of appropriate strategies for use of new digital technology for adherence monitoring is needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mcp.0000000000000334

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blake, K. V.
Affiliations
Nemours Children's Health System (US)
Corresponding author
Blake, Kathryn V.
Venue
Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine
Published
2017-01
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
62-70
ISSN
1070-5287 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2530548490
Cited by
40
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Keywords
asthma, medication adherence, inhaled corticosteroids, asthma controller medications, childhood asthma, adolescents and young adults, elderly patients, medication misuse, cognitive decline, electronic sensors, mobile application, patient-provider relationship
MeSH terms
Asthma, Humans, Parents, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review