Cited by 4Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesGenomics and Rare Diseases

Novel chromosomal microduplications associated with dolichocephaly craniosynostosis: A case report

Open access
Yu, Dongyi, Li, Shuo, Liu, Qi, Zhang, Kai·2017·Medicine

Abstract

INSTRUCTION: Craniosynostosis is a human disorder characterized by the premature fusing of the cranial sutures in infants. Point mutations in hotspot genes such as FGFRs are the well-recognized causes of syndromic craniosynostosis, but chromosomal abbreviations may also play an important role in developing this disease. Here, we report the case in China of a 2-year-boy dolichocephaly craniosynostosis. Karyotyping by both G-bind staining and array-based DNA hybridization identified microduplications on Chromosomes 8p11.22 q12.1 and 16q11.2 q21, but none of the known pathogenic mutations was detected. CONCLUSIONS: This finding not only expands knowledge on the genetic mechanism of craniosynostosis but also provides a new target for the early diagnosis of this rare disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/md.0000000000008729

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Altered gene dosage and disrupted regulation can contribute to sCS even in the absence of pathogenic coding variants.

    “Tandem duplications of upstream IHH enhancers, rare chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications, and CNVs involving regions that include genes such as FGF2, SPRY1, SEMA5A, FBLN2, and TMEM43 support the concept that altered gene dosage and disrupted regulation can contribute to sCS even in the absence of pathogenic coding variants [64, 85, 87, 115, 124].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, D., Li, S., Liu, Q., & Zhang, K.
Affiliations
Qingdao University (CN)
Corresponding author
Yu, Dongyi
Venue
Medicine
Published
2017-12
Volume
96
Issue
49
Pages
e8729
ISSN
0025-7974 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2771968566
Cited by
4
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Qingdao University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
craniosynostosis, dolichocephaly, chromosomal microduplication, FGFR mutations, cranial suture fusion, genetic diagnosis
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 8, Craniosynostoses, Head, Humans, Karyotyping, Male, Chromosome Duplication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review