Study on the effect of education for insulin injection in diabetic patients with new simulation tools
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Insulin is an essential therapy for treating diabetes, but many patients lack standard insulin injection skills. PURPOSE: We developed a standard training procedure based on a new simulation tool. Then we conducted a study to investigate the effect of this standard training on the ability of diabetic patients to inject themselves with insulin. METHODS: After follow-up, a total of 120 patients with diabetes mellitus were included. These patients needed insulin therapy depending on their condition and had not previously learned insulin injection. We randomly divided them into the intervention group (60 cases) and the control group (60 cases). The control group was trained on insulin injection before being discharged according to the traditional method, and the intervention group was trained based on an improved simulation tool. All participants were trained as individuals or groups. Finally, we evaluated the learning effects of both groups. RESULTS: The time spent at the training stage in the intervention group was shorter than the control group. We found that after applying simulation devices to mimic operations, the learning time for patients was reduced.The first subcutaneous injection success rate was 73.33% in the intervention group, which was significantly higher than that in the control group by 46.67%. The score of the first subcutaneous injection and pre-discharge score in the test group was significantly higher than that of the control group. One month later, the score for injection skills in the 2 groups was higher than that before discharge, and the score in the trial group was still higher than that in the control group. The incidence of subcutaneous fat hyperplasia in the trial group was lower than that in the control group (3.3% vs 15%, P < .05). Moreover, the incidence of hypoglycemia (16.7% vs. 26.7%) was higher in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .184). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: After applying simulation tools plus operating video and guideline as the standard procedure to train diabetic patients on insulin injection, all patients had a good grasp of using the insulin injection technique. This education method is safe, efficient, and worth promoting worldly.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Technologies such as mobile apps, simulation tools, digital coaching, and digital self-management interventions can be used to deliver diabetes self-management education and support.
“Technologies such as mobile apps, simulation tools, digital coaching, and digital self-management interventions can also be used to deliver DSMES (55)(56)(57)(58)(59)(60).”
From 5. Facilitating Positive Health Behaviors and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes:<i>Standards of Care in Diabetes—2023</i> (2023) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Puavilai, G., Chanprasertyotin, S., & Sriphrapradaeng, A. (1999) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/s0168-8227(99)00008-x · Cited by 221 · see citing works
New injection recommendations for patients with diabetes
Frid, A. H., Hirsch, L. J., Gaspar, R., Hicks, D., Kreugel, G., Liersch, J., Letondeur, C., Sauvanet, J.-P., Tubiana‐Rufi, N., & Strauss, K. W. (2010) · Diabetes & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/s1262-3636(10)70002-1 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Barriers to Insulin Injection Therapy
Rubin, R. R., Peyrot, M. F., Kruger, D. F., & Travis, L. B. (2009) · The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care · doi:10.1177/0145721709345773 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Results and analysis of the 2008–2009 Insulin Injection Technique Questionnaire survey
CONINCK, C. D., Frid, A. H., Gaspar, R., Hicks, D., HIRSCH, L., Kreugel, G., Liersch, J., Letondeur, C., Sauvanet, J.-P., Tubiana‐Rufi, N., et al. (2010) · Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.1111/j.1753-0407.2010.00077.x · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Management of Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes, 1998–2006: the Diabcare-China surveys
Pan, C., Yang, W., Jia, W., et al. (2008) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1185/03007990802586079 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Insulin pen injection technique survey in patients with type 2 diabetes in mainland China in 2010
Ji, J., & Lou, Q. (2014) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1185/03007995.2014.895711 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Мисникова, И. В., Gubkina, V. A., Lakeeva, T. S., & Dreval', A. V. (2017) · Diabetes Therapy · doi:10.1007/s13300-017-0315-y · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Çelik, S. G., Coşansu, G., Erdoğan, S., Kahraman, A., Isik, S., Bayrak, G., Bektas, B., & Olgun, N. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.12731 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
The Development and Pilot Testing of a Multimedia CD-ROM for Diabetes Education
Castaldini, M., SALTMARCH, M., Luck, S., & Sucher, K. P. (1998) · The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care · doi:10.1177/014572179802400304 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Subcutaneous injection technique: an evidence-based approach
Ogston-Tuck, S. (2014) · Nursing Standard · doi:10.7748/ns.29.3.53.e9183 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Epidemiology of Diabetes in Adults Aged 35 and Older from Shanghai, China.
Ruan, Y., Yan, Q. H., Xu, J. Y., Yang, Q. D., Yao, H. H., Li, R., & Shi, Y. (2016) · PubMed · doi:10.3967/bes2016.053 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Chinese diabetes drug delivery guideline(2016)
JI, L., & Guo, X. (2017) · Chin J Diabetes Mellitus · doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-5809.2017.02.005 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Injection technique guidelines for diabetes : sharp and to the point : DESSA guidelines
Davel, H., Berg, G. I., Allie, R., et al. (2014) · South African Medical Journal · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- [1]International Diabetes Federation, Aguiree F Brown A Cho NH. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 6th edition 2013.
- [5]Ji LN Guo XH Huang J. Chinese guideline for diabetic injection technology. Chin J Diabetes Mellitus 2017; 9: 79– 105.
- [13]Zhang X Liu XL Guo LX. Investigation and countermeasures for nurses’ problems in diabetes care. Diabetes New World 2014; 19: 77– 177. (In Chinese).
- [15]Cheng LH Zhang YL Zhong YJ. Effect of video guidance of insulin injection among diabetic patients. China Modern Doctor 2016; 54: 129– 34. (In Chinese).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ElSayed, N. A., Aleppo, G., Aroda, V. R., Bannuru, R. R., Brown, F. M., Bruemmer, D., Collins, B. S., Hilliard, M. E., Isaacs, D., Johnson, E. L., et al. (2023) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc23-s005 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee (2022) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc22-s005 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, ElSayed, N. A., McCoy, R. G., Aleppo, G., Balapattabi, K., Beverly, E. A., Briggs Early, K., Bruemmer, D., Echouffo-Tcheugui, J. B., Eichorst, B., et al. (2025) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc25-s005 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liang, K., Xie, Q., Nie, J., & Deng, J.
- Affiliations
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Wuzhou Worker Hospital, Gao Di Road
- Department of Neurology, the people's hospital, Sanlong Avenue, Changzhou District, Wuzhou, Guangxi, China.
- Corresponding author
- Liang, Kaiyong
- ORCID
- Liang, Kaiyong
- Venue
- Medicine
- Published
- 2021-04-09
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- e25424
- ISSN
- 0025-7974 (ISSN-L)
- 1536-5964
- PMC
- PMC8036090
- OpenAlex
- W3146244752
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 3.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
- Keywords
- insulin injection, diabetes mellitus, patient education, simulation-based training, injection success rate, hypoglycemia, diabetes self-management
- MeSH terms
- Simulation Training, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Injections, Subcutaneous, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Teaching Materials, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult, Learning Curve
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review