Cited by 26Diabetes Management and EducationSimulation-Based Education in HealthcareSurgical Simulation and Training

Study on the effect of education for insulin injection in diabetic patients with new simulation tools

Open access
Liang, Kaiyong, Xie, Qiao, Nie, Jieping, Deng, Jieqing·2021·Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Insulin is an essential therapy for treating diabetes, but many patients lack standard insulin injection skills. PURPOSE: We developed a standard training procedure based on a new simulation tool. Then we conducted a study to investigate the effect of this standard training on the ability of diabetic patients to inject themselves with insulin. METHODS: After follow-up, a total of 120 patients with diabetes mellitus were included. These patients needed insulin therapy depending on their condition and had not previously learned insulin injection. We randomly divided them into the intervention group (60 cases) and the control group (60 cases). The control group was trained on insulin injection before being discharged according to the traditional method, and the intervention group was trained based on an improved simulation tool. All participants were trained as individuals or groups. Finally, we evaluated the learning effects of both groups. RESULTS: The time spent at the training stage in the intervention group was shorter than the control group. We found that after applying simulation devices to mimic operations, the learning time for patients was reduced.The first subcutaneous injection success rate was 73.33% in the intervention group, which was significantly higher than that in the control group by 46.67%. The score of the first subcutaneous injection and pre-discharge score in the test group was significantly higher than that of the control group. One month later, the score for injection skills in the 2 groups was higher than that before discharge, and the score in the trial group was still higher than that in the control group. The incidence of subcutaneous fat hyperplasia in the trial group was lower than that in the control group (3.3% vs 15%, P < .05). Moreover, the incidence of hypoglycemia (16.7% vs. 26.7%) was higher in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .184). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: After applying simulation tools plus operating video and guideline as the standard procedure to train diabetic patients on insulin injection, all patients had a good grasp of using the insulin injection technique. This education method is safe, efficient, and worth promoting worldly.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/md.0000000000025424

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]International Diabetes Federation, Aguiree F Brown A Cho NH. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 6th edition 2013.
  2. [5]Ji LN Guo XH Huang J. Chinese guideline for diabetic injection technology. Chin J Diabetes Mellitus 2017; 9: 79– 105.
  3. [13]Zhang X Liu XL Guo LX. Investigation and countermeasures for nurses’ problems in diabetes care. Diabetes New World 2014; 19: 77– 177. (In Chinese).
  4. [15]Cheng LH Zhang YL Zhong YJ. Effect of video guidance of insulin injection among diabetic patients. China Modern Doctor 2016; 54: 129– 34. (In Chinese).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liang, K., Xie, Q., Nie, J., & Deng, J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Wuzhou Worker Hospital, Gao Di Road
  • Department of Neurology, the people's hospital, Sanlong Avenue, Changzhou District, Wuzhou, Guangxi, China.
Corresponding author
Liang, Kaiyong
Venue
Medicine
Published
2021-04-09
Volume
100
Issue
14
Pages
e25424
ISSN
  • 0025-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-5964
OpenAlex
W3146244752
Cited by
26
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
Keywords
insulin injection, diabetes mellitus, patient education, simulation-based training, injection success rate, hypoglycemia, diabetes self-management
MeSH terms
Simulation Training, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Injections, Subcutaneous, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Teaching Materials, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult, Learning Curve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review