Cited by 48Disaster Response and ManagementDisaster Management and ResilienceTrauma and Emergency Care Studies

Hospital preparedness and response in CBRN emergencies: TIER assessment tool

Olivieri, Carlo, Ingrassia, Pier L., Della Corte, Francesco, Carenzo, Luca, Sapori, Jean-Marc, Gabilly, Laurent, Segond, Fredrique, Grieger, Fiene +5 more·2017·European Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Introduction: Chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) emergencies need particular hospital preparedness and resources availability. Also, specific skills and capabilities are required for efficient response to these types of events. The aim of this study was to develop an assessment tool to evaluate hospital preparedness and response performance with respect to CBRN emergencies. Methods: An evaluation tool was developed using the Delphi technique. A panel of experts from 10 countries, both European and non-European, with more than 5 years of experience in research or practice in CBRN emergency management was involved in this study. The study was run online, and the experts were asked to evaluate a list of items on hospital preparedness and response in CBRN emergencies. A threshold of 85% agreement level was defined as the consensus of experts in this study. Results: The first-round questionnaire was answered by 13 experts. Consensus on the preparedness section was reached for all 29 items during the first round and one item was also added by the experts. Consensus on the response performance indicators were reached in 51 out of the 59 items, during the first round, and eight items were modified and then approved in the second round by the experts. Conclusion: Hospitals need a specific level of preparedness to enable an effective response to CBRN emergencies. The assessment tool, developed through experts’ consensus in this study, provides a standardized method for the evaluation of hospital preparedness and response performance with respect to CBRN emergencies. The feasibility and reliability of this assessment tool could be evaluated before and during simulated exercises in a standardized manner.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mej.0000000000000399

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other evaluation tools such as the Hospital Preparedness Assessment Tool (HPAT) and the Emergency Management Program Guidebook for Hospitals have shown promise in assessing hospital preparedness.

    “Apart from the HSI, other evaluation tools such as the Hospital Preparedness Assessment Tool (HPAT) and the Emergency Management Program Guidebook for Hospitals have also shown promise in assessing hospital preparedness.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olivieri, C., Ingrassia, P. L., Della Corte, F., Carenzo, L., Sapori, J.-M., Gabilly, L., Segond, F., Grieger, F., Arnod-Prin, P., Larrucea, X., Violi, C., Lopez, C., & Djalali, A.
Affiliations
  • Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” (IT)
  • Center for Research and Education in Emergency and Disaster Medicine – CRIMEDIM, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale
  • Université de Lyon (FR)
  • Research and Development, Viseo company, Paris, France
  • isw Institute for Structural Policy and Economic Development, Halle (Saale), Germany
  • Euskadiko Parke Teknologikoa (ES)
  • Research and Development, Novareckon, Novara, Italy
Corresponding author
Djalali, Ahmadreza
Venue
European Journal of Emergency Medicine
Published
2017-10
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
366-370
ISSN
0969-9546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2339825015
Cited by
48
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TECNALIA Publications (Fundación TECNALIA Research & Innovation) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Keywords
hospital preparedness, emergency response, assessment instruments, tiers, emergency management, expert consensus, Delphi method, chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear threats
MeSH terms
Delphi Technique, Disaster Planning, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospital Planning, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mass Casualty Incidents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review