The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epidemiology of Voice Disorders in the Elderly: Preliminary Findings
Abstract
Objectives: Epidemiologic studies of the prevalence and risk factors of voice disorders in the elderly, nontreatment seeking population are nonexistent. The purpose of this preliminary investigation was to 1) estimate the prevalence of voice disorders, 2) identify variables associated with increased risk of voice disorders, and 3) measure the socioemotional impact of voice disorders on the elderly who live independently. Study Design: Prospective, cross‐sectional survey. Methods: One hundred seventeen seniors (39 males and 78 females; mean age, 76.1 yr; SD, 8.5 yr; range, 65–94 yr), residing in Utah and Kentucky, were interviewed using a questionnaire that addressed three areas related to voice disorders: prevalence, potential risk factors, and socioemotional consequences/effects. Results: The lifetime prevalence of a voice disorder was 47%, with 29.1% of participants reporting a current voice disorder. The majority of respondents (60%) reported chronic voice problems persisting for at least 4 weeks. Seniors who had experienced esophageal reflux, severe neck/back injury, and chronic pain were at increased risk. Voice‐related effort and discomfort, combined with increased anxiety and frustration and the need to repeat oneself, were specific areas that adversely affected quality of life. Conclusions: This preliminary epidemiologic study confirmed that voice disorders are common among the elderly, and further research is needed to identify additional risk factors contributing to voice disorder vulnerability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Validation of an instrument to measure voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL)
Hogikyan, N. D., & Sethuraman, G. (1999) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/s0892-1997(99)80010-1 · Cited by 1,143
Cited by
Clinical Practice Guideline: Hoarseness (Dysphonia) (Update)
Stachler, R. J., Francis, D. O., Schwartz, S. R., Damask, C. C., Digoy, G. P., Krouse, H. J., McCoy, S. J., Ouellette, D. R., Patel, R. R., Reavis, C. (. W., et al. (2018) · Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1177/0194599817751030 · Cited by 368
Young, V., & Mihailidis, A. (2010) · Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/10400435.2010.483646 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Roy, N., Stemple, J., Merrill, R. M., & Thomas, L.
- Venue
- The Laryngoscope
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 628-633
- ISSN
- 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2036389141
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology of Voice Disorders in the Elderly: Preliminary Findings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/mlg.0b013e3180306da1
- The paper
- Roy, N., Stemple, J., Merrill, R. M., & Thomas, L. (2007). Epidemiology of Voice Disorders in the Elderly: Preliminary Findings. The Laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1097/mlg.0b013e3180306da1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.