Cited by 53Healthcare Policy and ManagementEducation and Military IntegrationHealth disparities and outcomes

Travel Time and Attrition From VHA Care Among Women Veterans: How Far is Too Far?

Open access
Friedman, Sarah A., Frayne, Susan M., Berg, Eric, Hamilton, Alison B., Washington, Donna L., Saechao, Fay, Maisel, Natalya C., Lin, Julia Y. +2 more·2015·Medical Care

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Travel time, an access barrier, may contribute to attrition of women veterans from Veterans Health Administration (VHA) care. OBJECTIVE: We examined whether travel time influences attrition: (a) among women veterans overall, (b) among new versus established patients, and (c) among rural versus urban patients. RESEARCH DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study used logistic regression to estimate the association between drive time and attrition, overall and for new/established and rural/urban patients. SUBJECTS: In total, 266,301 women veteran VHA outpatients in the Fiscal year 2009. MEASURES: An "attriter" did not return for VHA care during the second through third years after her first 2009 visit (T0). Drive time (log minutes) was between the patient's residence and her regular source of VHA care. "New" patients had no VHA visits within 3 years before T0. Models included age, service-connected disability, health status, and utilization as covariates. RESULTS: Overall, longer drive times were associated with higher odds of attrition: drive time adjusted odds ratio=1.11 (99% confidence interval, 1.09-1.14). The relationship between drive time and attrition was stronger among new patients but was not modified by rurality. CONCLUSIONS: Attrition among women veterans is sensitive to longer drive time. Linking new patients to VHA services designed to reduce distance barriers (telemedicine, community-based clinics, mobile clinics) may reduce attrition among women new to VHA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000296

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a case-control quasi-experiment among 266,301 women in the Veterans Health Administration, there was a positive relationship between travel distance and attrition, more so among new patients.

    “The findings indicated a positive relationship between travel distance and attrition, more so among new patients.”

    From The Empirical Foundations of Telemedicine Interventions in Primary Care (2016) · cites this paper as [76]

    The Abstract Results and Discussion report that longer drive time was associated with higher attrition, with a stronger association among new patients. The Methods (Study cohort) confirm 266,301 women, but the Abstract Research Design and Methods (Data sources) call this a retrospective cohort study, not a case-control quasi-experiment. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]Spoont M Greer N Su J Rural vs. Urban Ambulatory Health Care: A Systematic Review Department of Veterans Affairs 2011 VA-ESP Project #09-009 21735564

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Friedman, S. A., Frayne, S. M., Berg, E., Hamilton, A. B., Washington, D. L., Saechao, F., Maisel, N. C., Lin, J. Y., Hoggatt, K. J., & Phibbs, C. S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
  • Friedman, Sarah A.
  • Frayne, Susan M.
  • Berg, Eric
  • Washington, Donna L.
  • Saechao, Fay
  • Maisel, Natalya C.
  • Phibbs, Ciaran S.
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2015-04
Volume
53
Issue
Supplement 4Suppl 1
Pages
S15-S22
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2312250585
Cited by
53
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
14.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (TL1TR000121)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Military Integration
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
travel time, drive time, attrition, women veterans, Veterans Health Administration, health care access, urban-rural differences, telemedicine, mobile clinics, community clinics
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Automobile Driving, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Health Services Accessibility, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Retrospective Studies, Rural Population, Time Factors, Travel, United States, Urban Population, Women's Health, Veterans Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review