Cited by 36Electronic Health Records SystemsHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityHealthcare Systems and Technology

Do Patients Who Access Clinical Information on Patient Internet Portals Have More Primary Care Visits?

Leveille, Suzanne G., Mejilla, Roanne, Ngo, Long, Fossa, Alan, Elmore, Joann G., Darer, Jonathan, Ralston, James D., Delbanco, Tom +1 more·2016·Medical Care

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As health care costs alarm the nation and the debate increases about the impact of health information technologies, patients are reviewing their medical records increasingly through secure Internet portals. Important questions remain about the impact of portal use on office visits. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether use of patient Internet portals to access records is associated with increased primary care utilization. RESEARCH DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: Primary care patients registered on patient Internet portals, within an integrated health system serving rural Pennsylvania and an academic medical center in Boston. MEASURES: Frequency of "clinical portal use" (days/2 mo intervals over 2 y) included secure messaging about clinical issues and viewing laboratory and radiology findings. In year 2, a subset of patients also gained access to their primary care doctor's visit notes. The main outcome was number of primary care office visits. RESULTS: In the first 2 months of the 2-year period, 14% of 44,951 primary care patients engaged in clinical portal use 2 or more days per month, 31% did so 1 day per month, and the remainder had no clinical portal use. Overall, adjusted for age, sex, and chronic conditions, clinical portal use was not associated with subsequent office visits. Fewer than 0.1% of patients engaged in high levels of clinical portal use (31 or more login days in 2 mo) that were associated with 1 or more additional visits in the subsequent 2 months (months 3 and 4). However, the reverse was true: office visits led to subsequent clinical portal use. Similar trends were observed among patients with or without access to visit notes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients turn to their portals following visits, but clinical portal use does not contribute to an increase in primary care visits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000442

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leveille, S. G., Mejilla, R., Ngo, L., Fossa, A., Elmore, J. G., Darer, J., Ralston, J. D., Delbanco, T., & Walker, J.
Affiliations
  • Group Health Cooperative (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Geisinger Health System (US)
Corresponding author
  • Leveille, Suzanne G.
  • Mejilla, Roanne
  • Ngo, Long
  • Fossa, Alan
  • Delbanco, Tom
  • Walker, Jan
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2016-01
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
17-23
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2470710810
Cited by
36
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
Keywords
primary care utilization, office visits, health information technology, secure messaging, patient access to medical records
MeSH terms
Adult, Boston, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Office Visits, Patient Education as Topic, Physician-Patient Relations, Primary Health Care, Prospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Internet, Patient Access to Records, Consumer Health Information, Young Adult, Information Seeking Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review