The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative Responsiveness of the PROMIS Pain Interference Short Forms, Brief Pain Inventory, PEG, and SF-36 Bodily Pain Subscale
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: To compare the sensitivity to change and the responsiveness to intervention of the PROMIS Pain Interference short forms, Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), 3-item PEG scale, and SF-36 Bodily Pain subscale in a sample of patients with persistent musculoskeletal pain of moderate severity. METHODS: Standardized response means, standardized effect sizes, and receiver operating curve analyses were used to assess change between baseline and 3-month assessments in 250 participants who participated in a randomized clinical effectiveness trial of collaborative telecare management for moderate to severe and persistent musculoskeletal pain. RESULTS: The BPI, PEG, and SF-36 Bodily Pain measures were more sensitive to patient-reported global change than the PROMIS Pain Interference short forms, especially for the clinically improved group, for which the change detected by the PROMIS short forms was not statistically significant. The BPI was more responsive to the clinical intervention than the SF-36 Bodily Pain and PROMIS Pain Interference measures. Post hoc analyses exploring these findings did not suggest that differences in content or rating scale structure (number of response options or anchoring language) adequately explained the observed differences in the detection of change. CONCLUSIONS: In this clinical trial, the BPI and PEG measures were better able to detect change than the SF-36 Bodily Pain and PROMIS Pain Interference measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The validated 3-item PEG score, is the average of pain intensity (P), interference with enjoyment in life (E), and interference with general activity (G) over the past week (Cronbach’s α = .73-.89).42–45”
From Improving well-being for individuals with persistent pain after surgery for breast cancer, lobular carcinoma in situ, or ductal carcinoma in situ: A randomized clinical trial (2022) · cites this paper as [43]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
MCHORNEY, C. A., JOHNE, W., & ANASTASIAE, R. (1993) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199303000-00006 · Cited by 6,681
Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory.
Cs, C., & Km, R. (1994) · PubMed · Cited by 5,178
Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., Amtmann, D., Bode, R., Buysse, D., Choi, S., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.011 · Cited by 5,128
Validation of the Brief Pain Inventory for chronic nonmalignant pain
Tan, G., Jensen, M. P., Thornby, J. I., & Shanti, B. F. (2004) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2003.12.005 · Cited by 1,416 · cited 1×
“The BPI is an 11-item pain measure validated initially in cancer populations(20) and later in other clinical populations.(13,21) The BPI measures 2 domains of pain: a 4-item severity dimension and 7-item interference dimension.”
MethodMonitoring Depression Treatment Outcomes With the Patient Health Questionnaire-9
L??we, B., Un??tzer, J., Callahan, C. M., Perkins, A. J., & Kroenke, K. (2004) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-200412000-00006 · Cited by 1,354
Self-citationNilsdotter, A., Lohmander, S. L., Klässbo, M., & Roos, E. M. (2003) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/1471-2474-4-10 · Cited by 1,087
Krebs, E. E., Lorenz, K. A., Bair, M. J., Damush, T. M., Wu, J., Sutherland, J. M., Asch, S. M., & Kroenke, K. (2009) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-009-0981-1 · Cited by 782
Self-citationThe SF-36 Health Survey: Development and Use in Mental Health Research and the IQOLA Project
Ware, J. E., & Gandek, B. (1994) · International Journal of Mental Health · doi:10.1080/00207411.1994.11449283 · Cited by 599
Comparative responsiveness of generic and specific quality-of-life instruments
Wiebe, S., Guyatt, G., Weaver, B., Matijevic, S., & Sidwell, C. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00537-1 · Cited by 573
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–115 of 115
D'Souza, R. S., Gupta, M., & Abd-Elsayed, A. A. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-88223-1.00017-6
Scorsone, K. L., Carey, E., Nolan, C., Hale, A., Krebs, E. E., & Frank, J. W. (2025) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-025-09562-y
Self-citationPacheco-Barrios, K., Simis, M., de Melo, P. S., Rebello-Sanchez, I., Vasquez-Avila, K., Barbosa, S., Gonzalez-Mego, P., Battistella, L., Imamura, M., & Fregni, F. (2025) · Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology · doi:10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844639 · Cited by 1
Helm, A. F., Kachadoorian, E., Shaffer, P. M., Hall, O. T., & Smelson, D. A. (2025) · Substance Use & Addiction Journal · doi:10.1177/29767342251351127
McGill, L., Clay, O. J., Edwards, K. A., Jones, K. F., Long, D. M., Johnson, M. O., Bair, M. J., Browne, L., Liebschutz, J. M., Demonte, W., et al. (2025) · JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes · doi:10.1097/qai.0000000000003739
Olson, R., Hess, J. A., Turk, D., Marino, M., Greenspan, L. S., Alley, L., Donovan, C., & Rice, S. P. M. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26581436
Wang, J., Doan, L., Axelrod, D., Rotrosen, J., Wang, B., Park, H. G., Edwards, R. R., Curatolo, M., Jackman, C., & Perez, R. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26669646
Peter, S. C., Murphy, J. G., Witkiewitz, K. A., Hand, S. B., Thomas, F., Johnson, K. C., Cowan, R. L., Harris, M., & Derefinko, K. J. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26579036
Ballay, C. M., Remis, A., Roundy, P. E., Carvalho, M., LeBlond, N., Cook, C. E., & Duke University Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapy Fellowship (2026) · Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy · doi:10.1080/10669817.2026.2621130
Ashworth, J., Cornwall, N., Harrisson, S. A., Woodcock, C., Nicholls, E. E., Hughes, G., Marshall, E., Lawton, S., Wathall, S., Helliwell, T., et al. (2026) · NIHR Open Research · doi:10.3310/nihropenres.13961.2
Aurora, R. N., Matheson, P. B., Lu, S.-E., Andrews, T., Greenberg, P. J., Fredericks-Younger, J., Malmström, H., Miloro, M., Warburton, G., Ward, B. B., et al. (2026) · Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2026.108940
Le, K. N., COELHO, C. A., Feinn, R., & Fiszdon, J. M. (2026) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/86329
Rogal, S. S., Phares, A. D., Brach, M., Chinman, M. J., Gibson, S. P., Liebschutz, J. M., & Merlin, J. (2026) · Hepatology Communications · doi:10.1097/hc9.0000000000000955
Identification of high-impact chronic pain in adolescents with musculoskeletal pain
White, J. N., King, C. D., Coghill, R. C., López‐Solà, M., Moayedi, M., Stinson, J., Angst, M. S., Gaudilliere, B. L., Aghaeepour, N., & Simons, L. E. (2026) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000004092
McCord, E., Blackburn, J. L., Holmes, A. M., Apathy, N. C., Grout, R. W., Harle, C. A., & Mazurenko, O. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.10.07.26364970
Metadata
- Authors
- Kean, J., Monahan, P. O., Kroenke, K., Wu, J., Yu, Z., Stump, T. E., & Krebs, E. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- Medical Care
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 414-421
- ISSN
- 0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4792763
- OpenAlex
- W2266967734
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 8.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Medical Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (IIR 07-119, IK2 RX000879)
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001108)
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01AR064081)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- PROMIS pain interference, Brief Pain Inventory, pain interference, responsiveness to intervention, chronic musculoskeletal pain, patient-reported outcomes, standardized response mean, receiver operating characteristic
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Telemedicine, Comparative Effectiveness Research, Musculoskeletal Pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
