Cited by 22Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and TreatmentGastrointestinal disorders and treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Colonic ischemia: usual and unusual presentations and their management

Oglat, Ayah, Quigley, Eamonn M.M.·2017·Current Opinion in Gastroenterology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an update on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and management of colonic ischemia. RECENT FINDINGS: Formerly regarded as a rare cause of lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage, colonic ischemia is now recognized to be the most common manifestation of intestinal vascular compromise. In contrast to ischemic events in the small intestine wherein thrombotic and embolic events predominate, colonic ischemia typically results from a global reduction in blood flow to the colon and no occlusive lesion(s) are evident. Several risk factors for colonic ischemia have been identified and, together with an appropriate clinical presentation and patient demographics, create a context in which the clinician should have a high level of suspicion for its presence. Imaging with computerized tomography, in particular, may be highly supportive of the diagnosis, which where appropriate can be confirmed by colonoscopy and colonic biopsy. For most patients, management is supportive and noninterventional, and the prognosis for recurrence and survival are excellent. SUMMARY: Colonic ischemia is a common cause of lower abdominal pain and hemorrhage among the elderly typically occurring in the aftermath of an event which led to hypoperfusion of the colon. For most affected individuals the ischemia is reversible and clinical course benign.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mog.0000000000000325

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 22

Metadata

Authors
Oglat, A., & Quigley, E. M. M.
Affiliations
Houston Methodist (US)
Corresponding author
Quigley, Eamonn M.M.
Venue
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology
Published
2017-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
34-40
ISSN
0267-1379 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2542678633
Cited by
22
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments
Keywords
ischemic colitis, lower gastrointestinal bleeding, intestinal hypoperfusion, risk factors, clinical features, computed tomography diagnosis, colonoscopy, prognosis, elderly patients
MeSH terms
Colon, Humans, Ischemia, Risk Factors, Colitis, Ischemic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review