Cited by 183Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchGut microbiota and healthMicroscopic Colitis

Clostridium difficile infection: an update on epidemiology, risk factors, and therapeutic options

Lo Vecchio, Andrea, Zacur, George M.·2012·Current Opinion in Gastroenterology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) around the world has increased over the past 20 years due to the emergence of hypervirulent strains, increased use and misuse of antibiotics, and the increase of susceptible at-risk populations. Treatments currently available for CDI are inadequate to impede the increasing spread and virulence of the infection, avoid recurrence in chronic patients or prevent infection in at-risk populations. RECENT FINDINGS: New and promising evidence has been presented during the past year, focusing on two major points: preservation of gut microflora and optimization of immune response to CDI and toxins. SUMMARY: The review aims to summarize the most recent evidence available on the epidemiology, risk factors and treatment of CDI. New antibiotics with selected action on C. difficile and limited effect on microflora (fidaxomicin) and donor fecal transplantation seem to have a relevant efficacy in treating CDI and reducing its recurrence. The use of selected monoclonal antibodies directed against C. difficile toxins in addition to standard therapy is a new, promising approach for the treatment of recurrent cases. Vaccination could be an additional weapon against CDI. New robust data are needed before recommendations can be made to abandon current treatment based on vancomycin and metronidazole and move toward new frontiers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mog.0b013e32834bc9a9

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For moderate or severe C. difficile disease, particularly in oncologic patients, the first-line treatment is oral metronidazole (30 mg/kg/day); oral vancomycin is reserved for resistant strains.

    “For moderate or severe disease, particularly in oncologic patients, the first-line treatment is oral metronidazole (30 mg/kg/day); oral vancomycin is reserved for resistant strains 37, 38.”

    From Antibiotic treatment of acute gastroenteritis in children (2018) · cites this paper as [37]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lo Vecchio, A., & Zacur, G. M.
Affiliations
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Venue
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology
Published
2012-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
1-9
ISSN
0267-1379 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2318987907
Cited by
183
References
97
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Microscopic Colitis
Keywords
Clostridium difficile infection, hypervirulent strains, antibiotic misuse, fidaxomicin, fecal microbiota transplantation, monoclonal antibodies, recurrent infections, vancomycin, metronidazole, risk factors
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Clostridium Infections, Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous, Humans, Intestines, Risk Factors, United States, Incidence, Clostridioides difficile

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review