Cited by 212Phytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesNutritional Studies and DietNatural Antidiabetic Agents Studies

Dietary flavonoids and the development of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases: review of recent findings

van Dam, Rob M., Naidoo, Nasheen, Landberg, Rikard·2013·Current Opinion in Lipidology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the results on flavonoid intakes and the development of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent advances in food composition databases have allowed the evaluation of a more comprehensive range of flavonoids in epidemiological studies. In addition, the number of randomized trials of flavonoid-rich foods has increased rapidly. Results from both cohort studies and randomized trials suggest that anthocyanidins from berries and flavan-3-ols from green tea and cocoa may lower the risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Meta-analyses of randomized trials indicate that the strongest evidence exists for a beneficial effect of green tea on LDL-cholesterol and a beneficial effect of flavan-3-ol-rich cocoa on endothelial function and insulin sensitivity. Few randomized trials had a long duration or evaluated pure flavonoid compounds. SUMMARY: Evidence from cohort studies and randomized trials suggest beneficial effects of food sources of anthocyanidins (berries) and flavan-3-ols (green tea and cocoa) on cardiovascular health. These findings need to be confirmed in long-term randomized trials, and evaluation of pure compounds will be important to establish what specific flavonoids and doses are effective.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mol.0b013e32835bcdff

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 212

Authors
van Dam, R. M., Naidoo, N., & Landberg, R.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Venue
Current Opinion in Lipidology
Published
2013-02
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
25-33
ISSN
0957-9672 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2328652644
Cited by
212
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 13
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Lipidology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
Keywords
dietary flavonoids, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, anthocyanidins, berries, flavan-3-ols, green tea, Theobroma cacao, LDL cholesterol, endothelial function, insulin sensitivity, food composition tables
MeSH terms
Anthocyanins, Antioxidants, Cacao, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Eating, Endothelium, Vascular, Feeding Behavior, Flavonoids, Humans, Cholesterol, LDL, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Camellia sinensis, Flavonols

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review