Dietary flavonoids and the development of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases: review of recent findings
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the results on flavonoid intakes and the development of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent advances in food composition databases have allowed the evaluation of a more comprehensive range of flavonoids in epidemiological studies. In addition, the number of randomized trials of flavonoid-rich foods has increased rapidly. Results from both cohort studies and randomized trials suggest that anthocyanidins from berries and flavan-3-ols from green tea and cocoa may lower the risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. Meta-analyses of randomized trials indicate that the strongest evidence exists for a beneficial effect of green tea on LDL-cholesterol and a beneficial effect of flavan-3-ol-rich cocoa on endothelial function and insulin sensitivity. Few randomized trials had a long duration or evaluated pure flavonoid compounds. SUMMARY: Evidence from cohort studies and randomized trials suggest beneficial effects of food sources of anthocyanidins (berries) and flavan-3-ols (green tea and cocoa) on cardiovascular health. These findings need to be confirmed in long-term randomized trials, and evaluation of pure compounds will be important to establish what specific flavonoids and doses are effective.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Flavonoids and flavonoid-rich staple crops may play a role in the prevention of chronic human diseases such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cancer.
“Epidemiological studies and randomized clinical trials have suggested a possible role for flavonoids and flavonoid-rich staple crops in the prevention of chronic human diseases such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and cancer.24, 25”
PE and FG are under rigorous investigation for their anti-diabetic, weight reducing, cardioprotective, and anticarcinogenic properties.
“while PE and FG are under rigorous investigation for their anti-diabetic, weight reducing, cardioprotective, and anticarcinogenic properties.10, 11, 22, 24”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 45 · Cited by 212
- Authors
- van Dam, R. M., Naidoo, N., & Landberg, R.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Lipidology
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-33
- ISSN
- 0957-9672 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2328652644
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 13
- FWCI
- 2.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Lipidology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
- Keywords
- dietary flavonoids, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, anthocyanidins, berries, flavan-3-ols, green tea, Theobroma cacao, LDL cholesterol, endothelial function, insulin sensitivity, food composition tables
- MeSH terms
- Anthocyanins, Antioxidants, Cacao, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Eating, Endothelium, Vascular, Feeding Behavior, Flavonoids, Humans, Cholesterol, LDL, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Camellia sinensis, Flavonols
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review