Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 373

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 176 of the 176 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Guidelines for Surveillance and Medical Management of Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors

Open access
Strosberg, Jonathan R., Halfdanarson, Thorvardur R., Bellizzi, Andrew M., Chan, Jennifer A., Dillon, Joseph S., Heaney, Anthony P., Kunz, Pamela L., O’Dorisio, Thomas M., Salem, Riad, Segelov, Eva, Howe, James R., Pommier, Rodney F., Brendtro, Kari, Bashir, Mohammad A., Singh, Simron, Soulen, Michael C., Tang, Laura, Zacks, Jerome S., Yao, James C., Bergsland, Emily K.·2017·Pancreas

Abstract

There have been significant developments in diagnostic and therapeutic options for patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Key phase 3 studies include the CLARINET trial, which evaluated lanreotide in patients with nonfunctioning enteropancreatic NETs; the RADIANT-2 and RADIANT-4 studies, which evaluated everolimus in functioning and nonfunctioning NETs of the gastrointestinal tract and lungs; the TELESTAR study, which evaluated telotristat ethyl in patients with refractory carcinoid syndrome; and the NETTER-1 trial, which evaluated Lu-DOTATATE in NETs of the small intestine and proximal colon (midgut). Based on these and other advances, the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts with the goal of updating consensus-based guidelines for evaluation and treatment of midgut NETs. The medical aspects of these guidelines (focusing on systemic treatment, nonsurgical liver-directed therapy, and postoperative surveillance) are summarized in this article. Surgical guidelines are described in a companion article.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mpa.0000000000000850

Cites

176 of 176 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 176 references

Cited by

See all 373

Metadata

Authors
Strosberg, J. R., Halfdanarson, T. R., Bellizzi, A. M., Chan, J. A., Dillon, J. S., Heaney, A. P., Kunz, P. L., O’Dorisio, T. M., Salem, R., Segelov, E., Howe, J. R., Pommier, R. F., Brendtro, K., Bashir, M. A., Singh, S., Soulen, M. C., Tang, L., Zacks, J. S., Yao, J. C., & Bergsland, E. K.
Venue
Pancreas
Published
2017-07
Volume
46
Issue
6
Pages
707-714
ISSN
0885-3177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2625330427
Cited by
373
References
176
FWCI
21.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Guidelines for Surveillance and Medical Management of Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/mpa.0000000000000850
The paper
Strosberg, J. R., Halfdanarson, T. R., Bellizzi, A. M., Chan, J. A., Dillon, J. S., Heaney, A. P., Kunz, P. L., O’Dorisio, T. M., Salem, R., Segelov, E., Howe, J. R., Pommier, R. F., Brendtro, K., Bashir, M. A., Singh, S., Soulen, M. C., Tang, L., Zacks, J. S., Yao, J. C., & Bergsland, E. K. (2017). The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Guidelines for Surveillance and Medical Management of Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors. Pancreas. https://doi.org/10.1097/mpa.0000000000000850

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.