Cited by 34Pancreatitis Pathology and TreatmentPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Standard Operating Procedures for Biospecimen Collection, Processing, and Storage: From the Consortium for the Study of Chronic Pancreatitis, Diabetes, and Pancreatic Cancer

Open access
Fisher, William E., Cruz-Monserrate, Zobeida, McElhany, Amy L., Lesinski, Gregory B., Hart, Phil A., Ghosh, Ria, Van Buren, George, Fishman, Douglas S. +20 more·2018·Pancreas

Abstract

High-quality and well-annotated biorepositories are needed to better understand the pathophysiology and biologic mechanisms of chronic pancreatitis (CP) and its consequences. We report a methodology for the development of a robust standard operating procedure (SOP) for a biorepository based on the experience of the clinical centers within the consortium to study Chronic Pancreatitis, Diabetes and Pancreas Cancer Clinical Centers (CPDPC), supported by the National Cancer Institute and the National Institute for Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases as a unique multidisciplinary model to study CP, diabetes, and pancreatic cancer in both children and adults. Standard operating procedures from the CPDPC centers were evaluated and consolidated. The literature was reviewed for standard biorepository operating procedures that facilitated downstream molecular analysis. The existing literature on biobanking practices was harmonized with the SOPs from the clinical centers to produce a biorepository for pancreatic research. This article reports the methods and basic principles behind the creation of SOPs to develop a biorepository for the CPDPC. These will serve as a guide for investigators developing biorepositories in pancreas research. Rigorous and meticulous adherence to standardized biospecimen collection will facilitate investigations to better understand the pathophysiology and biologic mechanisms of CP, diabetes, and pancreatic cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mpa.0000000000001171

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fisher, W. E., Cruz-Monserrate, Z., McElhany, A. L., Lesinski, G. B., Hart, P. A., Ghosh, R., Van Buren, G., Fishman, D. S., Rinaudo, J. A. S., Serrano, J., Srivastava, S., Mace, T., Topazian, M., Feng, Z., Yadav, D., Pandol, S. J., Hughes, S. J., Liu, R. Y., Lu, E., Orr, R., Whitcomb, D. C., Abouhamze, A. S., Steen, H., Sellers, Z. M., Troendle, D. M., Uc, A., Lowe, M. E., & Conwell, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, and Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH;
  • Emory University (US)
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • The Elkins Pancreas Center, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, and Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX;
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
  • Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, National Institutes of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD;
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
  • Lucile Packard Children's Hospital (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Stead Family Children's Hospital, Iowa City, IA; and
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
  • Fisher, William E.
  • McElhany, Amy L.
  • Topazian, Mark
  • Whitcomb, David C.
  • Steen, Hanno
Venue
Pancreas
Published
2018-11
Volume
47
Issue
10
Pages
1213-1221
ISSN
  • 0885-3177 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-4828
OpenAlex
W2896422686
Cited by
34
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pancreas (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (P50AA011999)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01DK108327, U01DK108326, U01DK108320, U01DK108300, U01DK108306, U01DK108323, U01DK108314, U01DK108328, U01DK108334, P30DK054759, U01DK108288, P01DK098108)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
standard operating procedures, biospecimen collection, biospecimen storage, biorepository, chronic pancreatitis, diabetes mellitus, pancreatic cancer, biobanking, data harmonization
MeSH terms
Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Preservation, Biological, Specimen Handling, Guidelines as Topic, Biological Specimen Banks, Biomedical Research, Pancreatitis, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review