Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,394

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ESPGHAN Revised Porto Criteria for the Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children and Adolescents

Open access
Levine, Arie, Koletzko, Sibylle, Turner, Dan, Escher, Johanna C., Cucchiara, Salvatore, de Ridder, Lissy, Kolho, Kaija‐Leena, Veres, Gabor, Russell, Richard K., Paerregaard, Anders, Buderus, Stephan, Greer, Mary‐Louise C., Dias, Jorge A., Veereman‐Wauters, Gigi, Lionetti, Paolo, Sladek, Malgorzata, Martin de Carpi, Javier, Staiano, Annamaria, Ruemmele, Frank M., Wilson, David C.·2014·Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis of pediatric‐onset inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD) can be challenging in choosing the most informative diagnostic tests and correctly classifying PIBD into its different subtypes. Recent advances in our understanding of the natural history and phenotype of PIBD, increasing availability of serological and fecal biomarkers, and the emergence of novel endoscopic and imaging technologies taken together have made the previous Porto criteria for the diagnosis of PIBD obsolete. Methods: We aimed to revise the original Porto criteria using an evidence‐based approach and consensus process to yield specific practice recommendations for the diagnosis of PIBD. These revised criteria are based on the Paris classification of PIBD and the original Porto criteria while incorporating novel data, such as for serum and fecal biomarkers. A consensus of at least 80% of participants was achieved for all recommendations and the summary algorithm. Results: The revised criteria depart from existing criteria by defining 2 categories of ulcerative colitis (UC, typical and atypical); atypical phenotypes of UC should be treated as UC. A novel approach based on multiple criteria for diagnosing IBD‐unclassified (IBD‐U) is proposed. Specifically, these revised criteria recommend upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and ileocolonscopy for all suspected patients with PIBD, with small bowel imaging (unless typical UC after endoscopy and histology) by magnetic resonance enterography or wireless capsule endoscopy. Conclusions: These revised Porto criteria for the diagnosis of PIBD have been developed to meet present challenges and developments in PIBD and provide up‐to‐date guidelines for the definition and diagnosis of the IBD spectrum.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mpg.0000000000000239

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,394

Metadata

Authors
Levine, A., Koletzko, S., Turner, D., Escher, J. C., Cucchiara, S., de Ridder, L., Kolho, K., Veres, G., Russell, R. K., Paerregaard, A., Buderus, S., Greer, M. C., Dias, J. A., Veereman‐Wauters, G., Lionetti, P., Sladek, M., Martin de Carpi, J., Staiano, A., Ruemmele, F. M., & Wilson, D. C.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-06
Volume
58
Issue
6
Pages
795-806
ISSN
  • 0277-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-4801
OpenAlex
W2160011929
Cited by
1,394
References
1
FWCI
28.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ESPGHAN Revised Porto Criteria for the Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children and Adolescents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/mpg.0000000000000239
The paper
Levine, A., Koletzko, S., Turner, D., Escher, J. C., Cucchiara, S., de Ridder, L., Kolho, K., Veres, G., Russell, R. K., Paerregaard, A., Buderus, S., Greer, M. C., Dias, J. A., Veereman‐Wauters, G., Lionetti, P., Sladek, M., Martin de Carpi, J., Staiano, A., Ruemmele, F. M., & Wilson, D. C. (2014). ESPGHAN Revised Porto Criteria for the Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children and Adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1097/mpg.0000000000000239

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.