Cited by 2,683Celiac Disease Research and ManagementEosinophilic EsophagitisWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology

European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Coeliac Disease

Open access
Husby, S., Koletzko, S., Korponay‐Szabó, I.R., Mearin, M.L., Phillips, A., Shamir, R., Troncone, R., Giersiepen, K. +9 more·2012·Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Abstract

Objective: Diagnostic criteria for coeliac disease (CD) from the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) were published in 1990. Since then, the autoantigen in CD, tissue transglutaminase, has been identified; the perception of CD has changed from that of a rather uncommon enteropathy to a common multiorgan disease strongly dependent on the haplotypes human leukocyte antigen (HLA)‐DQ2 and HLA‐DQ8; and CD‐specific antibody tests have improved. Methods: A panel of 17 experts defined CD and developed new diagnostic criteria based on the Delphi process. Two groups of patients were defined with different diagnostic approaches to diagnose CD: children with symptoms suggestive of CD (group 1) and asymptomatic children at increased risk for CD (group 2). The 2004 National Institutes of Health/Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality report and a systematic literature search on antibody tests for CD in paediatric patients covering the years 2004 to 2009 was the basis for the evidence‐based recommendations on CD‐specific antibody testing. Results: In group 1, the diagnosis of CD is based on symptoms, positive serology, and histology that is consistent with CD. If immunoglobulin A anti‐tissue transglutaminase type 2 antibody titers are high (>10 times the upper limit of normal), then the option is to diagnose CD without duodenal biopsies by applying a strict protocol with further laboratory tests. In group 2, the diagnosis of CD is based on positive serology and histology. HLA‐DQ2 and HLA‐DQ8 testing is valuable because CD is unlikely if both haplotypes are negative. Conclusions: The aim of the new guidelines was to achieve a high diagnostic accuracy and to reduce the burden for patients and their families. The performance of these guidelines in clinical practice should be evaluated prospectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mpg.0b013e31821a23d0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The literature search was performed in PubMed or Medline for articles published in English from January 2010 to March 2020, relevant to children and adolescents (<18 years) diagnosed with coeliac disease according to ESPGHAN criteria.

    “We searched in PubMed or in Medline for articles published in English from January 2010 to March 2020, relevant to children and adolescents (&lt;18 years) diagnosed with CD according to the ESPGHAN criteria (2,3).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Husby, S., Koletzko, S., Korponay‐Szabó, I. R., Mearin, M. L., Phillips, A., Shamir, R., Troncone, R., Giersiepen, K., Branski, D., Catassi, C., Lelgeman, M., Mäki, M., Ribes‐Koninckx, C., Ventura, A., Zimmer, K. P., ESPGHAN Working Group on Coeliac Disease Diagnosis, & ESPGHAN Gastroenterology Committee
Affiliations
  • Odense University Hospital (DK)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Center
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • University of Bremen (DE)
  • Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
  • Tampere University Hospital (FI)
  • University of Trieste (IT)
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Husby, S.
  • Giersiepen, K.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-01
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
136-160
ISSN
  • 0277-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-4801
OpenAlex
W2100548379
Cited by
2,683
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 80 · 2025: 105 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 126 · 2022: 162 · 2021: 232 · 2020: 221 · 2019: 227 · 2018: 225 · 2017: 211 · 2016: 233 · 2015: 235 · 2014: 221 · 2013: 167 · 2012: 90
FWCI
158.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Debrecen Electronic Archive (University of Debrecen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Keywords
celiac disease, diagnostic criteria, pediatric celiac disease, anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies, HLA-DQ2, HLA-DQ8, serological diagnosis, duodenal biopsy, diagnostic accuracy, ESPGHAN guidelines
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Celiac Disease, Child, Duodenum, HLA-DQ Antigens, Humans, Immunoglobulin A, Transglutaminases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review