The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Term Infants Fed Formula Supplemented With Selected Blends of Prebiotics Grow Normally and Have Soft Stools Similar to Those Reported for Breast‐fed Infants
Abstract
Objectives: The present study was designed to evaluate the effect of 2 different combinations of prebiotic ingredients, polydextrose (PDX), galactooligosaccharides (GOS), and lactulose (LOS), at 2 different intake levels on the overall growth and tolerance in healthy term infants up to 120 days of age. Patients and Methods: Healthy, formula‐fed, term infants (n = 226) were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 study formula groups: control group (n = 76), PG4 group (control formula supplemented with 4 g/L of a prebiotic blend, n = 74), or PGL8 group (control formula supplemented with 8 g/L of a prebiotic blend, n = 76). Anthropometric measurements were taken at 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120 days of age, and 24‐hour dietary recall and 24‐hour tolerance recall were recorded at 30, 60, 90, and 120 days of age. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study. Results: There were no statistically significant differences among the 3 formula groups for weight growth rate or length growth rate at any time point. Significant differences in stool consistency were detected among the 3 formula groups at 30, 60, and 90 days of age (P < 0.001, P = 0.025, P = 0.004, respectively), with the supplemented formula groups having looser stools than the control group. The PGL8 group had significantly higher stool frequency compared with the control and PG4 groups at 30 days of age (P = 0.021 and P = 0.017, respectively), but all of the groups were similar at 60, 90, and 120 days of age. A statistical difference was detected among the formula groups in 3 categories of adverse events: diarrhea (control vs PG4, 4% vs 18%, P = 0.008), eczema (PG4 vs control, 18% vs 7%, P = 0.046; PG4 vs PGL8, 18% vs 4%, P = 0.008), and irritability (control vs PGL8, 4% vs 16%, P = 0.027). Conclusions: Infants fed formula supplemented with a prebiotic mixture achieved normal growth and stool characteristics more similar to those of breast‐fed infants in comparison with infants fed an unsupplemented formula. A pediatrician needs to consider the risk of possible intolerance against the benefits of prebiotics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fiocchi, A., Pawankar, R., Cuello-Garcia, C., Ahn, K., Al-Hammadi, S., Agarwal, A., Beyer, K., Burks, W., Canonica, G. W., Ebisawa, M., et al. (2015) · World Allergy Organization Journal · doi:10.1186/s40413-015-0055-2 · Cited by 473
Davis, E. C., Wang, M., & Donovan, S. M. (2017) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.1080/19490976.2016.1278104 · Cited by 169
The importance of the development of the intestinal microbiota in infancy
Vael, C., & Desager, K. (2009) · Current Opinion in Pediatrics · doi:10.1097/mop.0b013e328332351b · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Ziegler, E., Vanderhoof, J. A., Petschow, B., Mitmesser, S. H., Stolz, S. I., Harris, C. L., & Berseth, C. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 359-364
- ISSN
- 0277-2116 (ISSN-L)
- 1536-4801
- OpenAlex
- W1980479035
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Term Infants Fed Formula Supplemented With Selected Blends of Prebiotics Grow Normally and Have Soft Stools Similar to Those Reported for Breast‐fed Infants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/mpg.0b013e31802fca8c
- The paper
- Ziegler, E., Vanderhoof, J. A., Petschow, B., Mitmesser, S. H., Stolz, S. I., Harris, C. L., & Berseth, C. L. (2007). Term Infants Fed Formula Supplemented With Selected Blends of Prebiotics Grow Normally and Have Soft Stools Similar to Those Reported for Breast‐fed Infants. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1097/mpg.0b013e31802fca8c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.