Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Practical Approach to Paediatric Enteral Nutrition: A Comment by the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition

Open access
ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition:, Braegger, Christian, Decsi, Tamas, Dias, Jorge Amil, Hartman, Corina, Kolaček, Sanja, Koletzko, Berthold, Koletzko, Sibylle, Mihatsch, Walter, Moreno, Luis, Puntis, John, Shamir, Raanan, Szajewska, Hania, Turck, Dominique, van Goudoever, Johannes·2010·Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Abstract

Enteral nutrition support (ENS) involves both the delivery of nutrients via feeding tubes and the provision of specialised oral nutritional supplements. ENS is indicated in a patient with at least a partially functioning digestive tract when oral intake is inadequate or intake of normal food is inappropriate to meet the patients' needs. The aim of this comment by the Committee on Nutrition of the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition is to provide a clinical practice guide to ENS, based on the available evidence and the clinical expertise of the authors. Statements and recommendations are presented, and future research needs highlighted, with a particular emphasis placed on a practical approach to ENS. Among the wide array of enteral formulations, standard polymeric feeds based on cow's‐milk protein with fibre and age adapted for energy and nutrient content are suitable for most paediatric patients. Whenever possible, intragastric is preferred to postpyloric delivery of nutrients, and intermittent feeding is preferred to continuous feeding because it is more physiological. An anticipated duration of enteral nutrition (EN) exceeding 4 to 6 weeks is an indication for gastrostomy or enterostomy. Among the various gastrostomy techniques available, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is currently the first option. In general, both patients and caregivers express satisfaction with this procedure, although it is associated with a number of well‐recognised complications. We strongly recommend the development and application of procedural protocols that include scrupulous attention to hygiene, as well as regular monitoring by a multidisciplinary nutrition support team to minimise the risk of EN‐associated complications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mpg.0b013e3181d336d2

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Metadata

Authors
ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition:, Braegger, C., Decsi, T., Dias, J. A., Hartman, C., Kolaček, S., Koletzko, B., Koletzko, S., Mihatsch, W., Moreno, L., Puntis, J., Shamir, R., Szajewska, H., Turck, D., & van Goudoever, J.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-07
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
110-122
ISSN
  • 0277-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-4801
OpenAlex
W2043747701
Cited by
317
References
63
FWCI
7.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Practical Approach to Paediatric Enteral Nutrition: A Comment by the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/mpg.0b013e3181d336d2
The paper
ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition:, Braegger, C., Decsi, T., Dias, J. A., Hartman, C., Kolaček, S., Koletzko, B., Koletzko, S., Mihatsch, W., Moreno, L., Puntis, J., Shamir, R., Szajewska, H., Turck, D., & van Goudoever, J. (2010). Practical Approach to Paediatric Enteral Nutrition: A Comment by the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1097/mpg.0b013e3181d336d2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.