The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ripe for Disruption? Adopting Nurse-Led Data Science and Artificial Intelligence to Predict and Reduce Hospital-Acquired Outcomes in the Learning Health System
Abstract
Nurse leaders are dually responsible for resource stewardship and the delivery of high-quality care. However, methods to identify patient risk for hospital-acquired conditions are often outdated and crude. Although hospitals and health systems have begun to use data science and artificial intelligence in physician-led projects, these innovative methods have not seen adoption in nursing. We propose the Petri dish model, a theoretical hybrid model, which combines population ecology theory and human factors theory to explain the cost/benefit dynamics influencing the slow adoption of data science for hospital-based nursing. The proliferation of nurse-led data science in health systems may be facing several barriers: a scarcity of doctorally prepared nurse scientists with expertise in data science; internal structural inertia; an unaligned national “precision health” strategy; and a federal reimbursement landscape, which constrains—but does not negate the hard dollar business case. Nurse executives have several options: deferring adoption, outsourcing services, and investing in internal infrastructure to develop and implement risk models. The latter offers the best performing models. Progress in nurse-led data science work has been sluggish. Balanced partnerships with physician experts and organizational stakeholders are needed, as is a balanced PhD-DNP research-practice collaboration model.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Notwithstanding these important implications of AI for the nursing profession, there is a growing, but still a limited critical discourse in the nursing literature (Brennan & Bakken, 2015; Linnen et al., 2019).”
From Artificial intelligence in nursing: Priorities and opportunities from an international invitational think‐tank of the Nursing and Artificial Intelligence Leadership Collaborative (2021) · cites this paper as Linnen et al., 2019
Citations
Cites
Nursing Needs Big Data and Big Data Needs Nursing
Brennan, P. F., & Bakken, S. (2015) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/jnu.12159 · Cited by 199
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- Adler, 2018, Impact of inpatient harms on hospital finances and patient clinical outcomes, J Patient Saf, 14, 67, 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000171 · DOI
- Waugh, 2016, Inter-rater agreement of pressure ulcer risk and prevention measures in the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators((R)) (NDNQI), Res Nurs Health, 39, 164, 10.1002/nur.21717 · DOI
- Garrard, 2016, Reliability and validity of the NDNQI(R) injury falls measure, West J Nurs Res, 38, 111, 10.1177/0193945914542851 · DOI
- Tchouaket, 2017, The economic burden of nurse-sensitive adverse events in 22 medical-surgical units: retrospective and matching analysis, J Adv Nurs, 73, 1696, 10.1111/jan.13260 · DOI
- Mushta, 2018, Failure to rescue as a nurse-sensitive indicator, Nurs Forum, 53, 84, 10.1111/nuf.12215 · DOI
- Porter-O'Grady, 2018, Guest editorial, Nurs Adm Q, 42, 2, 10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000270 · DOI
- Bodenheimer, 2014, From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider, Ann Fam Med, 12, 573, 10.1370/afm.1713 · DOI · Paper page
- Liu, 2016, Data that drive: closing the loop in the learning hospital system, J Hosp Med, 11, S11, 10.1002/jhm.2651 · DOI
- Bergstrom, 1987, The Braden Scale for predicting pressure sore risk, Nurs Res, 36, 205, 10.1097/00006199-198707000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
- Schmid, 1990, 1989 Federal Nursing Service Award Winner. Reducing patient falls: a research-based comprehensive fall prevention program, Mil Med, 155, 202, 10.1093/milmed/155.5.202 · DOI
- Subbe, 2001, Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions, QJM, 94, 521, 10.1093/qjmed/94.10.521 · DOI
- Patel, 2018, Can early warning scores identify deteriorating patients in pre-hospital settings? A systematic review, Resuscitation, 132, 101, 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.08.028 · DOI
- Linnen, 2019, Statistical modeling and aggregate-weighted scoring systems in prediction of mortality and ICU transfer: a systematic review, J Hosp Med, 14, 161, 10.12788/jhm.3151 · DOI
- Hyun, 2013, Predictive validity of the Braden scale for patients in intensive care units, Am J Crit Care, 22, 514, 10.4037/ajcc2013991 · DOI
- Alderden, 2018, Predicting pressure injury in critical care patients: a machine-learning model, Am J Crit Care, 27, 461, 10.4037/ajcc2018525 · DOI
- Christensen, 2015, What is disruptive innovation, Harvard Bus Rev, 93, 44
- Westra, 2015, Nursing knowledge: big data science-implications for nurse leaders, Nurs Adm Q, 39, 304, 10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000130 · DOI
- Westra, 2017, Big data science: a literature review of nursing research exemplars, Nurs Outlook, 65, 549, 10.1016/j.outlook.2016.11.021 · DOI
- Linnen, 2016, The promise of big data: improving patient safety and nursing practice, Nursing, 46, 28, 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000482256.71143.09 · DOI
- Westra, 2015, A national action plan for sharable and comparable nursing data to support practice and translational research for transforming health care, J Am Med Inform Assoc, 22, 600, 10.1093/jamia/ocu011 · DOI
- Delaney, 2018, 2018 Nursing Knowledge Big Data Science Initiative, Comput Inform Nurs, 36, 473, 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000486 · DOI
- Amarasingham, 2016, Consensus Statement on Electronic Health Predictive Analytics: A Guiding Framework to Address Challenges, EGEMS (Wash DC), 4, 1163
- Bates, 2014, Big data in health care: using analytics to identify and manage high-risk and high-cost patients, Health Aff (Millwood), 33, 1123, 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0041 · DOI · Paper page
- Parikh, 2016, Integrating predictive analytics into high-value care: the dawn of precision delivery, JAMA, 315, 651, 10.1001/jama.2015.19417 · DOI
- Linnen, 2018, Risk adjustment for hospital characteristics reduces unexplained hospital variation in pressure injury risk, Nurs Res, 67, 314, 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000287 · DOI
- Berwick, 2012, Eliminating waste in US health care, JAMA, 307, 1513, 10.1001/jama.2012.362 · DOI
- Mooney, 2015, Commentary: epidemiology in the era of big data, Epidemiology, 26, 390, 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000274 · DOI
- Acquaviva, 2013, Human cognition and the dynamics of failure to rescue: the Lewis Blackman case, J Prof Nurs, 29, 95, 10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.12.009 · DOI
- Reason, 1995, Understanding adverse events: human factors, Qual Health Care, 4, 80, 10.1136/qshc.4.2.80 · DOI
- Roth, 2015, Hospital nurses’ perceptions of human factors contributing to nursing errors, J Nurs Adm, 45, 263, 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000196 · DOI
- Henly, 2015, Integrating emerging areas of nursing science into PhD programs, Nurs Outlook, 63, 408, 10.1016/j.outlook.2015.04.010 · DOI
- Hannan, 1977, The population ecology of organizations, Am J Sociol, 82, 929, 10.1086/226424 · DOI
- Winters, 2013, Rapid-response systems as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review, Ann Intern Med, 158, 417, 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303051-00009 · DOI · Paper page
- Manojlovich, 2007, Power and empowerment in nursing: looking backward to inform the future, Online J Issues Nurs, 12, 2, 10.3912/OJIN.Vol12No01Man01 · DOI
- Bindman, 2018, Funding innovation in a learning health care system, JAMA, 319, 119, 10.1001/jama.2017.18205 · DOI
- Paulson, 2017, Legal and ethical concerns of big data: predictive analytics, Clin Nurse Spec, 31, 237, 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000315 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ronquillo, C. E., Peltonen, L., Pruinelli, L., Chu, C. H., Bakken, S., Beduschi, A., Cato, K., Hardiker, N., Junger, A., Michalowski, M., et al. (2021) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.14855 · Cited by 453
Predicted Influences of Artificial Intelligence on Nursing Education: Scoping Review
Buchanan, C., Howitt, M. L., Wilson, R., Booth, R. G., Risling, T., & Bamford, M. (2021) · JMIR Nursing · doi:10.2196/23933 · Cited by 326
Predicted Influences of Artificial Intelligence on the Domains of Nursing: Scoping Review
Buchanan, C., Howitt, M. L., Wilson, R., Booth, R. G., Risling, T., & Bamford, M. (2020) · JMIR Nursing · doi:10.2196/23939 · Cited by 238
Advancing nursing practice with artificial intelligence: Enhancing preparedness for the future
Rony, M. K. K., Parvin, M. R., & Ferdousi, S. (2024) · Nursing Open · doi:10.1002/nop2.2070 · Cited by 202
Barriers to Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Healthcare Management: A Systematic Review
Assadullah, M. M. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3530598 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Linnen, D. T., Javed, P. S., & D'Alfonso, J. N.
- Affiliations
- Kaiser Permanente (US)
- Corresponding author
- Linnen, Daniel T.
- Venue
- Nursing Administration Quarterly
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 246-255
- ISSN
- 0363-9568 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2948180748
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nursing Administration Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in nursing, hospital-acquired conditions, learning health systems, technology adoption barriers, population ecology theory, nurse researchers, precision health, reimbursement policy, risk prediction model, nursing leadership, research-practice collaboration, DNP
- MeSH terms
- Data Science, Artificial Intelligence, Data Collection, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Iatrogenic Disease, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Nurse's Role
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review