Cited by 238Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationNursing Roles and PracticesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Predicted Influences of Artificial Intelligence on the Domains of Nursing: Scoping Review

Open access
Buchanan, Christine, Howitt, M Lyndsay, Wilson, Rita, Booth, Richard G, Risling, Tracie, Bamford, Megan·2020·JMIR Nursing

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is set to transform the health system, yet little research to date has explored its influence on nurses—the largest group of health professionals. Furthermore, there has been little discussion on how AI will influence the experience of person-centered compassionate care for patients, families, and caregivers. Objective: This review aims to summarize the extant literature on the emerging trends in health technologies powered by AI and their implications on the following domains of nursing: administration, clinical practice, policy, and research. This review summarizes the findings from 3 research questions, examining how these emerging trends might influence the roles and functions of nurses and compassionate nursing care over the next 10 years and beyond. Methods: Using an established scoping review methodology, MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central, Education Resources Information Center, Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases were searched. In addition to the electronic database searches, a targeted website search was performed to access relevant gray literature. Abstracts and full-text studies were independently screened by 2 reviewers using prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included articles focused on nursing and digital health technologies that incorporate AI. Data were charted using structured forms and narratively summarized. Results: A total of 131 articles were retrieved from the scoping review for the 3 research questions that were the focus of this manuscript (118 from database sources and 13 from targeted websites). Emerging AI technologies discussed in the review included predictive analytics, smart homes, virtual health care assistants, and robots. The results indicated that AI has already begun to influence nursing roles, workflows, and the nurse-patient relationship. In general, robots are not viewed as replacements for nurses. There is a consensus that health technologies powered by AI may have the potential to enhance nursing practice. Consequently, nurses must proactively define how person-centered compassionate care will be preserved in the age of AI. Conclusions: Nurses have a shared responsibility to influence decisions related to the integration of AI into the health system and to ensure that this change is introduced in a way that is ethical and aligns with core nursing values such as compassionate care. Furthermore, nurses must advocate for patient and nursing involvement in all aspects of the design, implementation, and evaluation of these technologies. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/17490

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/23939

Cites

135 of 135 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Automating administrative tasks enhances patient safety.

    “Automating administrative tasks such as documentation, scheduling, and resource allocation not only reduces nurse workload but also enhances workflow efficiency and patient safety [45,57].”

    From The Role of AI in Nursing Education and Practice: Umbrella Review (2025) · cites this paper as [57]

    The Results (Administration; page not provided) describe AI tools that may reduce documentation burden and assist with scheduling. The Discussion (Nursing Administration; page not provided) says these applications could potentially streamline workflows and improve the efficiency and accuracy of patient care. It does not establish that automating administrative tasks enhances patient safety, and the citing sentence states the benefits more definitively than the review does. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This gap risks fostering overreliance on AI systems, potentially eroding essential interpersonal skills and undermining core nursing values such as empathy and patient-centered care.

    “This gap risks fostering overreliance on AI systems, potentially eroding essential interpersonal skills and undermining core nursing values such as empathy and patient-centered care [45,57].”

    From The Role of AI in Nursing Education and Practice: Umbrella Review (2025) · cites this paper as [57]

    The Discussion’s Nursing Practice section warns that AI technologies could leave nurses spending less time with patients and says they should augment, not replace, care. The Results also report concerns about nurses’ ability to engage in caring interactions. The paper does not link a gap to overreliance on AI or say that nurses’ interpersonal skills would erode. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Automating administrative tasks such as documentation, scheduling, and resource allocation reduces nurse workload.

    “Automating administrative tasks such as documentation, scheduling, and resource allocation not only reduces nurse workload but also enhances workflow efficiency and patient safety [45,57].”

    From The Role of AI in Nursing Education and Practice: Umbrella Review (2025) · cites this paper as [57]

    The Results (Administration; page unavailable) say AI tools may schedule nursing tasks, assign patients to rooms, and reduce documentation burden; they also report that improvements to documentation can leave more time for patient care. The Discussion (Nursing Administration; page unavailable) describes streamlined workflows as a potential benefit. The paper does not establish that automating all three listed tasks, including resource allocation, reduces nurse workload as a demonstrated outcome. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Automating administrative tasks enhances workflow efficiency.

    “Automating administrative tasks such as documentation, scheduling, and resource allocation not only reduces nurse workload but also enhances workflow efficiency and patient safety [45,57].”

    From The Role of AI in Nursing Education and Practice: Umbrella Review (2025) · cites this paper as [57]

    The Discussion’s Nursing Administration section says AI tools for scheduling, documentation, and triage could potentially streamline workflows and improve efficiency. It presents this as a possibility, not an established effect, whereas the claim says automation enhances efficiency. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These tools exemplify how AI can augment nursing practice, if implementation frameworks account for the unique challenges of diverse health care contexts.

    “These tools exemplify how AI can augment nursing practice, if implementation frameworks account for the unique challenges of diverse health care contexts [57].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. American Nurses AssociationNursing scope and standards of practice (3rd edition)20152020-01-10https://www.nursingworld.org/nurses-books/nursing-scope-and-standards-of-practice-3rd-ed/
  2. Ihde, D, 1990, Technology And The Lifeworld: From Garden To Earth (Indiana Series In The Philosophy Of Technology)
  3. Chawla, N, 2020, Int J Green Energy, 7, 9
  4. Nieto Franco, F, 2018, Stud Health Technol Inform, 250, 50
  5. Kriegel, J, 2019, Stud Health Technol Inform, 260, 178
  6. Glauser, W, 2017, Can Nurse, 113, 24
  7. Carroll, W, 2018, Online J Nurs Inform, 22, NA
  8. Carroll, W, 2019, Online J Nurs Inform, 23, NA
  9. Kaminski, J, 2018, Online J Nurs Inform, 22, NA
  10. Ishiguro, K, 2016, Stud Health Technol Inform, 225, 913
  11. Effken, JA, 2014, Online Journal of Nursing Informatics, 18, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buchanan, C., Howitt, M. L., Wilson, R., Booth, R. G., Risling, T., & Bamford, M.
Affiliations
  • Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (CA)
  • Western University (CA)
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Corresponding author
Buchanan, Christine
Venue
JMIR Nursing
Published
2020-12-17
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
e23939
ISSN
2562-7600 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3095399468
Cited by
238
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 7
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Nursing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University Health Network
  • Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario
  • Associated Medical Services
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
artificial intelligence, nursing role, nursing management, clinical practice, nursing policy, nursing research, predictive analytics, home automation, nursing robots, nurse-patient relationship, digital health technologies, ethical integration of AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review