Cited by 38Nursing care and researchFamily Caregiving in Mental IllnessCancer survivorship and care

Family Caregivers of Patients With a High-Grade Glioma: A Qualitative Study of Their Lived Experience and Needs Related to Professional Care

Coolbrandt, Annemarie, Sterckx, Wendy, Clement, Paul, Borgenon, Sonja, Decruyenaere, Marleen, de Vleeschouwer, Steven, Mees, Anne, Dierckx de Casterlé, Bernadette·2015·Cancer Nursing

Abstract

Background The poor prognosis and disabling symptoms of a high-grade glioma (HGG) affect not only the patient but place high demands on family caregivers. Objective The objective of this study was to explore the experience of family caregivers of patients with HGG and their needs related to professional care. Methods A qualitative research using semistructured interviews was conducted. Sixteen family caregivers of patients with an HGG who were treated or in follow-up at a Belgian hospital were interviewed. Results Family caregivers reported experiencing loss of their old life and the patient's old self. They were saddened to see the patient's disabilities and the change in their relationship, which in turn contributed to feelings of loneliness. At the same time, they reported a strong commitment and determination to provide the patient with the best possible care. Many, however, felt unprepared to do so, and they reported feeling insecure. Caregivers expressed the need for information and for consideration and support. Conclusions The diagnosis of an HGG is disruptive to the life of family caregivers. They strongly commit but at the same time struggle to care for the patient. Implications for practice Professional caregivers should be aware of the subtle balance between family caregivers' wish to care and the burden of caregiving. Professional caregivers can be of great value to family caregivers by providing guidance and assistance for this new caregiving role while being co…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/ncc.0000000000000216

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coolbrandt, A., Sterckx, W., Clement, P., Borgenon, S., Decruyenaere, M., de Vleeschouwer, S., Mees, A., & Dierckx de Casterlé, B.
Affiliations
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Coolbrandt, Annemarie
Venue
Cancer Nursing
Published
2015-09
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
406-413
ISSN
0162-220X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2331418601
Cited by
38
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 4
FWCI
5.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
family caregivers, high-grade glioma, caregiver burden, caregiver experiences, caregiver needs, caregiver grief, caregiver loneliness, caregiver preparedness, caregiver support
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Brain Neoplasms, Female, Glioma, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Caregivers, Qualitative Research, Neoplasm Grading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review