Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Brain Protein Preservation Largely Depends on the Postmortem Storage Temperature: Implications for Study of Proteins in Human Neurologic Diseases and Management of Brain Banks: A BrainNet Europe Study

Ferrer, Isidre, Santpere, Gabriel, Arzberger, Thomas, Bell, Jeanne, Blanco, Rosa, Boluda, Susana, Budka, Herbert, Carmona, Margarita, Giaccone, Giorgio, Krebs, Bjarne, Limido, Lucia, Parchi, Piero, Puig, Berta, Strammiello, Rosaria, Ströbel, Thomas, Kretzschmar, Hans·2007·Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology

Abstract

The present study was designed to reveal protein modifications in control cases related with postmortem delay and temperature of storage in 3 paradigms in which the same postmortem tissue sample (frontal cortex) was frozen a short time after death or stored at 1 degrees C, 4 degrees C, or room temperature and then frozen at -80 degrees C at different intervals. No evidence of protein degradation as revealed with monodimensional gel electrophoresis and Western blotting was observed in samples artificially stored at 1 degrees C and then frozen at different intervals up to 50 hours after death. However, the levels of several proteins were modified in samples stored at 4 degrees C and this effect was more marked in samples stored at room temperature. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry further corroborated these observations and permitted the identification of other proteins vulnerable or resistant to postmortem delay. Finally, gel electrophoresis and Western blotting of sarkosyl-insoluble fractions in Alzheimer disease showed reduced intensity of phospho-tau-specific bands with postmortem delay with the effects being more dramatic when the brain samples were stored at room temperature for long periods. These results emphasize the necessity of reducing the body temperature after death to minimize protein degradation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nen.0b013e31802c3e7d

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
Ferrer, I., Santpere, G., Arzberger, T., Bell, J., Blanco, R., Boluda, S., Budka, H., Carmona, M., Giaccone, G., Krebs, B., Limido, L., Parchi, P., Puig, B., Strammiello, R., Ströbel, T., & Kretzschmar, H.
Venue
Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology
Published
2007-01
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
35-46
ISSN
0022-3069 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090375451
Cited by
175
References
0
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brain Protein Preservation Largely Depends on the Postmortem Storage Temperature: Implications for Study of Proteins in Human Neurologic Diseases and Management of Brain Banks: A BrainNet Europe Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/nen.0b013e31802c3e7d
The paper
Ferrer, I., Santpere, G., Arzberger, T., Bell, J., Blanco, R., Boluda, S., Budka, H., Carmona, M., Giaccone, G., Krebs, B., Limido, L., Parchi, P., Puig, B., Strammiello, R., Ströbel, T., & Kretzschmar, H. (2007). Brain Protein Preservation Largely Depends on the Postmortem Storage Temperature: Implications for Study of Proteins in Human Neurologic Diseases and Management of Brain Banks: A BrainNet Europe Study. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1097/nen.0b013e31802c3e7d

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.