Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 183

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuropathologic Features of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration With Ubiquitin-Positive Inclusions With Progranulin Gene (PGRN) Mutations

Josephs, Keith A., Ahmed, Zeshan, Katsuse, Omi, Parisi, Joseph F., Boeve, Bradley F., Knopman, David S., Petersen, Ronald C., Davies, Peter, Duara, Ranjan, Graff-Radford, Neill R., Uitti, Ryan J., Rademakers, Rosa, Adamson, Jennifer, Baker, Matthew, Hutton, Michael L., Dickson, Dennis W.·2007·Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology

Abstract

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration is heterogeneous; cases with tau- and synuclein-negative, ubiquitin-positive neuronal inclusions are the most common, and some have mutations in the gene for progranulin (PGRN). The purpose of this study was to determine whether there were distinctive clinical and neuropathologic features of frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive inclusions with PGRN mutations. A retrospective review of medical records and semiquantitative neuropathologic analysis was performed on 18 PGRN(+) and 24 PGRN(-) cases. Clinically, PGRN(+) cases had more frequent language impairment and parkinsonism. Pathologically, PGRN(+) cases had smaller brains, more marked global atrophy, and more frontal atrophy. There was no difference in the frequency of hippocampal sclerosis. The pathology of PGRN(+) cases was relatively homogeneous, whereas PGRN(-) cases were more heterogenous. PGRN(+) cases had greater density of cortical ubiquitin-immunoreactive lesions, especially dystrophic neurites in layer II. Intranuclear inclusions were present in all PGRN(+) and 42% of PGRN(-) cases. The results suggest that frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive inclusions due to PGRN mutations has several characteristic features, including ubiquitin-immunoreactive neuritic pathology in superficial cortical layers and neuronal intranuclear inclusions. On the other hand, there is no histopathologic feature or combination of features that is pathognomonic. Neuronal intranuclear inclusions are virtually always present, but they can be detected in PGRN(-) cases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nen.0b013e31803020cf

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 183

Metadata

Authors
Josephs, K. A., Ahmed, Z., Katsuse, O., Parisi, J. F., Boeve, B. F., Knopman, D. S., Petersen, R. C., Davies, P., Duara, R., Graff-Radford, N. R., Uitti, R. J., Rademakers, R., Adamson, J., Baker, M., Hutton, M. L., & Dickson, D. W.
Venue
Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology
Published
2007-02
Volume
66
Issue
2
Pages
142-151
ISSN
0022-3069 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063019912
Cited by
183
References
8
FWCI
17.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuropathologic Features of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration With Ubiquitin-Positive Inclusions With Progranulin Gene (PGRN) Mutations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/nen.0b013e31803020cf
The paper
Josephs, K. A., Ahmed, Z., Katsuse, O., Parisi, J. F., Boeve, B. F., Knopman, D. S., Petersen, R. C., Davies, P., Duara, R., Graff-Radford, N. R., Uitti, R. J., Rademakers, R., Adamson, J., Baker, M., Hutton, M. L., & Dickson, D. W. (2007). Neuropathologic Features of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration With Ubiquitin-Positive Inclusions With Progranulin Gene (PGRN) Mutations. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1097/nen.0b013e31803020cf

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.