The 2016 Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice
Abstract
Approximately every 5 years, the Infusion Nurses Society publishes evidence-based practice standards. This article provides an overview of the process used in standards development, describes the format of the standards, and provides a short summary of selected standards as applied to home care. The Standards are an important document that should be available to every home care organization that provides home infusion therapy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The training and experience the phlebotomist had received is an important factor that determines their ability to select a good quality vein.
“The training and the experience the phlebotomist had received is an important factor that determines their ability to select a good quality vein.6,7”
From Evaluation of a scoring system for vein suitability in platelet apheresis donors (2024) · cites this paper as [7]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
van Loon, F. H. J., Buise, M. P., Claassen, J. J. F., Dierick-van Daele, A. T. M., & Bouwman, A. R. A. (2018) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2018.04.047 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
van Loon, F. H. J., van Hooff, L. W. E., de Boer, H. D., Koopman, S. S. H. A., Buise, M. P., Korsten, H. H. M., Dierick-van Daele, A. T. M., & Bouwman, A. R. A. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm8020144 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
“After two failed attempts by one practitioner, the following attempts were performed by another practitioner [8,12].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDavis, E. M., Feinsmith, S., Amick, A. E., Sell, J., McDonald, V., Trinquero, P., Moore, A., Gappmaier, V., Colton, K., Cunningham, A., et al. (2021) · The American Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2020.11.013 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Twibell, K. R., Hofstetter, P., Siela, D., Brown, D., & Jones, H. M. (2019) · Journal of Infusion Nursing · doi:10.1097/nan.0000000000000338 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Evaluation of a tool to score donor vein suitability for blood donation
Hirani, R., O’Donovan, J., Knight, E., Bell, B., & Mondy, P. (2019) · Vox Sanguinis · doi:10.1111/vox.12820 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Evaluation of a scoring system for vein suitability in platelet apheresis donors
Noushad, S., Basavarajegowda, A., Toora, E., Sahoo, D., & Hari Priya, K. M. (2024) · Journal of Clinical Apheresis · doi:10.1002/jca.22106 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gorski, L. A.
- Corresponding author
- Gorski, Lisa A.
- Venue
- Home Healthcare Now
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-18
- ISSN
- 0884-741X (ISSN-L)
- 2374-4529
- OpenAlex
- W2613277336
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 70.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Home Healthcare Now (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
- Keywords
- standards of practice, home infusion, home care nursing, standard development process, evidence-based practice
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Quality Control, Societies, Nursing, United States, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Home Infusion Therapy, Evidence-Based Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
