Cited by 112Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Intensive Short-Term Dynamic Psychotherapy for DSM-IV Personality Disorders: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abbass, Allan, Sheldon, Albert, Gyra, John, Kalpin, Allen·2008·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficacy and long-term effectiveness of intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy (ISTDP) in the treatment of patients with DSM-IV personality disorders (PD). Twenty-seven patients with PD were randomized to treatment with ISTDP or a minimal-contact, delayed-treatment control condition. ISTDP-treated patients improved significantly more than controls on all primary outcome indices, reaching the normal ranges on both the brief symptom inventory (1.51-0.51, p < 0.001) and inventory of interpersonal problems (1.56-0.67, p < 0.001). When control patients were treated, they experienced benefits similar to the initial treatment group. In long-term follow-up, the whole group maintained their gains and had an 83.3% reduction of personality disorder diagnoses. Treatment costs were thrice offset by reductions in medication and disability payments. This preliminary study of ISTDP suggests it is efficacious and cost-effective in the treatment of PD. Limitations of this study and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmd.0b013e3181662ff0

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In clinical practice, people offered treatment usually meet diagnostic criteria for several categories of personality disorders.

    “in clinical practice people offered treatment usually meet diagnostic criteria for several categories of personality disorders”

    From Personality disorder: a new global perspective (2010) · cites this paper as [39]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abbass, A., Sheldon, A., Gyra, J., & Kalpin, A.
Affiliations
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Abbass, Allan
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2008-03
Volume
196
Issue
3
Pages
211-216
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975021069
Cited by
112
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy, personality disorders, DSM-IV personality disorders, treatment efficacy, long-term follow-up, cost-effectiveness, Brief Symptom Inventory, interpersonal problems, maintenance of treatment gains
MeSH terms
Adult, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Demography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Personality Disorders, Psychotherapy, Brief, Health Care Costs, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review