Cited by 42Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMental Health Treatment and Access

Attrition in a Multicenter Clinical Trial for Panic Disorder

White, Kamila S., Allen, Laura B., Barlow, David H., Gorman, Jack M., Shear, M. Katherine, Woods, Scott W.·2010·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

This study examined attrition in a multisite clinical trial for panic disorder. Of 379 eligible patients, 19 refused treatment (5% Refusal Rate), 104 discontinued treatment prematurely (19% Dropout Rate) or were withdrawn by the investigators (8% Withdrawal Rate), and 256 completed the treatment (68% Completion Rate). Logistic regression was used to examine 5 domains theorized to be related to attrition (e.g., diagnostic severity, treatment factors). Few variables were associated with increased odds of attrition at padj < 0.004. Younger age was the only independent predictor of attrition in the demographic factor model. Diagnostic severity and comorbidity, panic disorder symptom severity, treatment factors, and therapist factors were unrelated to study attrition. Patient dropout was highest after treatment sessions that targeted interoceptive and situational exposure exercises. Findings suggest that attrition may not strongly threaten the validity of results from treatment outcome studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmd.0b013e3181ef3627

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 42

Authors
White, K. S., Allen, L. B., Barlow, D. H., Gorman, J. M., Shear, M. K., & Woods, S. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri–St. Louis (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
White, Kamila S.
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2010-09
Volume
198
Issue
9
Pages
665-671
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011055759
Cited by
42
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH 45964, MH 45966, R01MH045966, R01 MH45963, R01MH045963, MH 45965, R01MH045965)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
attrition, panic disorder, treatment discontinuation, treatment refusal, completion rates, predictors of attrition, interoceptive exposure
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Dropouts, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Logistic Models, Panic Disorder, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review