Cited by 37Stress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and BurnoutHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Occupational Stressors, Stress Perception Levels, and Coping Styles of Medical Surgical RNs: A Generational Perspective

Wakim, Nada·2014·JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the occupational stressors, the perceived stress levels, and coping styles of 3 generations of medical-surgical (MS) nurses. BACKGROUND: The literature supports that the nurse's role is stressful based on a variety of factors including physical labor, human suffering, work hours, staffing, and interpersonal relationships. Data indicate that there are generational differences in the response to stress. The 3 predominant nursing generations coexisting in the nursing workforce add to the complexity of the recognition and coping skills to address stress. METHODS: A correlational design was used. A convenience sample of MS nurses participated in this study by completing 4 questionnaires. RESULTS: Occupational stressors were found to be significant predictors for perceived stress among all generations of nurses in this sample. Also, the higher the level of stress perception among nurses, the higher the use of coping behaviors. Generation Y reported a higher level of perceived stress and higher use of escape avoidance coping behaviors, while baby boomers reported higher use of self-controlling coping behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: By identifying the needs of each of the generational cohorts, nurse leaders, nurse educators, and policy makers can better assist the nursing workforce to remain at the bedside, improve patient outcomes, and maintain a positive work environment.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nna.0000000000000140

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Folkman, 1985, If it changes it must be a process: study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination., J Pers Soc Psychol, 48, 150, 10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.150 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 37

Metadata

Authors
Wakim, N.
Corresponding author
Wakim, Nada
Venue
JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration
Published
2014-12
Volume
44
Issue
12
Pages
632-639
ISSN
0002-0443 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009891189
Cited by
37
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
occupational stressors, perceived stress, coping styles, medical-surgical nurses, generational differences, millennials, baby boomers, escape-avoidance coping, nursing workforce, work environment
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Age Factors, Burnout, Professional, Female, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Perioperative Nursing, United States, Cohort Studies, Nursing Evaluation Research, Workload, Intergenerational Relations, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review