Innovative teaching strategies in DNP education using ChatGPT
Abstract
Quattrini, Veronica DNP, FNP-BC; Roesch, Amanda DNP, FNP-C; Kretz, Dawn DNP, CPNP-PC Author Information
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Educators indicated hesitancy in incorporating ChatGPT in nursing education because it transcends an ethical issue, leading to data security concerns.
“In one study (Quattrini et al., 2024), educators indicated hesitancy in incorporating ChatGPT in nursing education because it transcends an ethical issue, leading to data security concerns, among others (Goktas et al., 2024).”
From Current trends and future implications in the utilization of ChatGPT in nursing: a rapid review (2024) · cites this paper as Quattrini et al., 2024
ChatGPT can be used to evaluate the level of thinking among students.
“and evaluate the level of thinking among students (Quattrini et al., 2024).”
From Current trends and future implications in the utilization of ChatGPT in nursing: a rapid review (2024) · cites this paper as Quattrini et al., 2024
Creating different scenarios to assess ChatGPT's ability to adapt to differences within a context.
“In addition, creating different scenarios to assess ChatGPT's ability to adapt to differences within a context (Quattrini et al., 2024).”
From Current trends and future implications in the utilization of ChatGPT in nursing: a rapid review (2024) · cites this paper as Quattrini et al., 2024
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 4 · Cited by 16
- Authors
- Quattrini, V., Roesch, A., & Kretz, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- Corresponding author
- Quattrini, Veronica
- Venue
- Nurse Educator
- Published
- 2023-10-23
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- E162-E163
- ISSN
- 0363-3624 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-9855
- OpenAlex
- W4387899772
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nurse Educator (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, DNP education, innovative teaching strategies, artificial intelligence in nursing education, doctoral nursing education, generative AI in teaching
- MeSH terms
- Education, Nursing, Graduate, Educational Status, Faculty, Nursing, Humans, Students, Nursing, Teaching, Nursing Education Research, Nursing Evaluation Research, Nursing Methodology Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
