Cited by 87Cancer survivorship and careCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Testing a Theoretical Model of Perceived Self-efficacy for Cancer-Related Fatigue Self-management and Optimal Physical Functional Status

Open access
Hoffman, Amy J., von Eye, Alexander, Gift, Audrey G., Given, Barbara A., Given, Charles W., Rothert, Marilyn·2009·Nursing Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Critical gaps exist in the understanding of cancer symptoms, particularly for cancer-related fatigue (CRF). Existing theories and models do not examine the key role perceived self-efficacy (PSE) plays in a person's ability to manage symptoms. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that physical functional status (PFS) is predicted through patient characteristics, CRF, other symptoms, and PSE for fatigue self-management in persons with cancer. METHODS: This study is a secondary data analysis from the baseline observation of two randomized control trials. The combined data set includes 298 participants who were undergoing a course of chemotherapy. Key variables included physiological and contextual patient characteristics, the severity from CRF and other symptoms, PSE, and PFS. Path analysis examined the relationships among the variables in the proposed theoretical model. RESULTS: Persons with cancer reported CRF as the most prevalent symptom among a mean of 7.4 other concurrent symptoms. The severity from CRF had a direct and indirect effect on PFS, with CRF having a direct adverse impact on PFS (t = -7.02) and an indirect adverse effect as part of the severity from the other symptoms (t = 9.69), which also adversely impacted PFS (t = -2.71). Consistent with the proposed theoretical model, PSE had a positive effect on the PFS (t = 2.87) of persons with cancer while serving as a mediator between CRF severity and PFS. DISCUSSION: Cancer-related fatigue is prevalent and related to the presence of other symptoms, and PSE for fatigue self-management is an important factor influencing CRF and PFS. A foundation is provided for future intervention studies to increase PSE to achieve optimal PFS in persons with cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nnr.0b013e3181903d7b

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-efficacy (confidence in one's capability to influence one's fatigue) is thought to promote adaptive health behaviors and mediate CRF severity.

    “Self-efficacy, that is, one's confidence in their capability to influence one's fatigue, is also thought to promote adaptive health behaviors and mediate CRF severity.14,15”

    From Exploring the dynamic interconnectedness of protective and perpetuating factors of cancer-related fatigue (2023) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Discussion (Hypothesis 3; page not provided) links perceived self-efficacy to health-promoting self-management behaviors, although it says those behaviors were not measured in this study. It finds that self-efficacy mediates the relationship between CRF severity and physical functional status—not CRF severity itself. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kline R 2005 Principles and practice of structural equation modeling 2nd New York The Guilford Press
  2. von Eye A Schuster C 1998 Regression analysis for social sciences San Diego, CA Academic Press
  3. Ware JE Snow KK Kosinski M Gandek B 1993 SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and interpretation guide Boston, MA Nimrod Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoffman, A. J., von Eye, A., Gift, A. G., Given, B. A., Given, C. W., & Rothert, M.
Affiliations
  • Grand Valley State University (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
Venue
Nursing Research
Published
2009-01
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
32-41
ISSN
0029-6562 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061275660
Cited by
87
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nursing Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1f31nr009621-01a1)
  • National Cancer Institute (R0-1 CA-30724, R01CA030724, R01CA079280)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (1F31 NR009621-01A1, F31 NR009621)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
cancer-related fatigue, self-efficacy, fatigue self-management, physical functional status, chemotherapy, symptom severity, mediation model, cancer patients
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Health, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Neoplasms, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Severity of Illness Index, Nursing Evaluation Research, Nursing Methodology Research, Chi-Square Distribution, Models, Nursing, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review