Brain Camp: a summer pipeline program to increase diversity in neurosciences
Abstract
Background: Despite calls to increase diversity in the health care workforce, most medical fields including neurology have seen minimal advances, owing in part to the lack of developing a robust pipeline for trainees from underrepresented backgrounds. We sought to create an immersive, replicable neurology-themed summer camp and longitudinal mentorship program for underrepresented-in-medicine (URM) high-school students to encourage them to enter the training pipeline in neuroscience-related fields. Methods: We established an annual, no-cost 1-week camp for local URM students with the goals of exposing them to different health care professions within neuroscience while providing them with college application resources and long-term mentorship. A postprogram survey was distributed to assess the students’ attitudes towards the camp and their desires to pursue health care careers. Results: Over the 4 years since the founding of the camp (2016-2020), a total of 96 students participated, of whom 53% were URM, 74% came from very low-income households, and 61% had parents who did not attend college. In total, 87 students (91%) completed the postcamp survey. Nearly all (97%) of the respondents were likely to recommend the camp to their peers, and the vast majority (85%) felt that Brain Camp made them more likely to pursue careers in health care. Conclusions: Brain Camp seeks to address the unmet need for low barrier-to-entry programs designed for URM high-school students interested in health care careers. We envision that our camp may serve as a blueprint for other similar programs across the nation with the goal of addressing the URM pipeline in neuroscience.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Similar programs involving observation, mentorship, preparation, and research have been established in otolaryngology, neurology, and regenerative medicine, enabling longitudinal subspecialty mentorship, opportunities for scholarly presentations, and increased interest in graduate and medical school, as well as STEM careers.
“Similar programs involving observation, mentorship, preparation, and research have been established in otolaryngology, neurology, and regenerative medicine, enabling longitudinal subspecialty mentorship, opportunities for scholarly presentations, and increased interest in graduate and medical school, as well as STEM careers [8,18,24].”
From Efficacy of Early Exposure Medical Programs for Underrepresented Students: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as [24]
Programs targeting subspecialties can provide tailored information, preparation, and mentorship to foster interest tailored to a niche.
“Programs targeting subspecialties can provide tailored information, preparation, and mentorship to foster interest tailored to a niche [5,8,11,18,24].”
From Efficacy of Early Exposure Medical Programs for Underrepresented Students: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as [24]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Efficacy of Early Exposure Medical Programs for Underrepresented Students: A Systematic Review
Jaganathan, N., Guntaka, R., Goel, V., Odo, N., Sun, Z., & Arthur, M. E. (2026) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.109396
- Authors
- Wei, X. P., Diwanji, D., McHenry, L., Lea, R., McCluskey, K., Griffin, S., Comrie, A., Margol, V., & Josephson, S. A.
- Affiliations
- Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wei, Xin Paul
- Diwanji, Devan
- McHenry, Lauren
- Lea, Robin
- McCluskey, Kate
- Griffin, Sandon
- Comrie, Alison
- Josephson, S. Andrew
- Venue
- The Neurologist
- Published
- 2021-12-30
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 173-176
- ISSN
- 1074-7931 (ISSN-L)
- 2331-2637
- OpenAlex
- W4200516960
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Neurologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
- Keywords
- underrepresented minorities in medicine, summer science camp, mentoring programs, high school students, neuroscience careers, low-income students
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Career Choice, Humans, Minority Groups, Students, Medical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review