Cited by 37Reproductive tract infections researchHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sexual partnership characteristics of African American women who have sex with women; impact on sexually transmitted infection risk.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: African American women who have sex with women (WSW) are emerging as a population at risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). The objectives of this study were to explore partnership characteristics for a cohort of African American WSW and evaluate those characteristics as potential risk factors for STIs. In addition, we aimed to determine STI diagnoses and identify predictors of STI infection. METHODS: Women who have sex with women presenting to a sexually transmitted disease clinic in Birmingham, AL, completed a questionnaire and were tested for bacterial vaginosis, trichomoniasis, chlamydia, gonorrhea, Mycoplasma genitalium, syphilis, HIV, and herpes simplex virus type 2. RESULTS: A total of 163 women were enrolled: 78 WSW and 85 women who have sex with women and men (WSWM) (based on report of past year sexual behavior). Both WSW and WSWM reported similar numbers of female partners over the lifetime, past year, and past month; however, WSWM reported significantly more lifetime male partners, thus having a higher overall number of sexual partners. Women who have sex with women and men were more likely to report new or casual partner(s), group sex, history of STIs, and sex with partner(s) known to have STIs. Overall, WSWM were more likely to have a current diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis, a current diagnosis of a curable STI, or a diagnosis of a noncurable STI (85% vs. 56%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: African American WSW are not a homogeneous group, and their sexual health may be directly or indirectly influenced by male partners. A better understanding of the distinctions and differences between African American WSW and WSWM will enable health care providers to improve the quality of care provided.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/olq.0000000000000194

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Muzny, C. A., Austin, E. L., Harbison, H. S., & Hook, E. W.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Muzny, Christina A.
Venue
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Published
2014-10
Volume
41
Issue
10
Pages
611-617
ISSN
0148-5717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020534069
Cited by
37
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Keywords
African American women, women who have sex with women, sexually transmitted infections, STI risk factors, bacterial vaginosis, trichomoniasis, chlamydia, gonorrhea, Mycoplasma genitalium, syphilis, HIV, herpes simplex virus type 2, group sex, casual sex, sexual health disparities
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Alabama, Bisexuality, Black or African American, Coitus, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Homosexuality, Female, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review