Cited by 85HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsReproductive tract infections researchHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk

Barriers to bacterial sexually transmitted infection testing of HIV-infected men who have sex with men engaged in HIV primary care.

Open access
Barbee, Lindley A., Dhanireddy, Shireesha, Tat, Susana A., Marrazzo, Jeanne M.·2015·Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 15% of HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM) engaged in HIV primary care have been diagnosed as having a sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the past year, yet STI testing frequency remains low. METHODS: We sought to quantify STI testing frequencies at a large, urban HIV care clinic, and to identify patient- and provider-related barriers to increased STI testing. We extracted laboratory data in aggregate from the electronic medical record to calculate STI testing frequencies (defined as the number of HIV-infected MSM engaged in care who were tested at least once over an 18-month period divided by the number of MSM engaged in care). We created anonymous surveys of patients and providers to elicit barriers. RESULTS: Extragenital gonorrhea and chlamydia testing was low (29%-32%), but the frequency of syphilis testing was higher (72%). Patients frequently reported high-risk behaviors, including drug use (16.4%) and recent bacterial STI (25.5%), as well as substantial rates of recent testing (>60% in prior 6 months). Most (72%) reported testing for STI in HIV primary care, but one-third went elsewhere for "easier" (42%), anonymous (21%), or more frequent (16%) testing. HIV primary care providers lacked testing and treatment knowledge (25%-32%) and cited lack of time (68%), discomfort with sexual history taking and genital examination (21%), and patient reluctance (39%) as barriers to increased STI testing. CONCLUSION: Sexually transmitted infection testing in HIV care remains unacceptably low. Enhanced education of providers, along with strategies to decrease provider time and increase patient ease and frequency of STI testing, is needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/olq.0000000000000320

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Basing screening practices solely on history might be suboptimal because providers might feel uncomfortable taking a detailed sexual history, men might also feel uncomfortable sharing personal sexual information with their provider, and rectal and pharyngeal infections can be identified even in the absence of reported risk behaviors.

    “Basing screening practices solely on history might be suboptimal because providers might feel uncomfortable taking a detailed sexual history (229), men might also feel uncomfortable sharing personal sexual information with their provider, and rectal and pharyngeal infections can be identified even in the absence of reported risk behaviors (171).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [229]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barbee, L. A., Dhanireddy, S., Tat, S. A., & Marrazzo, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Public Health – Seattle & King County (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • San Francisco State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Barbee, Lindley A.
  • Dhanireddy, Shireesha
  • Marrazzo, Jeanne M.
Venue
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Published
2015-10
Volume
42
Issue
10
Pages
590-594
ISSN
0148-5717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2418408296
Cited by
85
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (PS1-1103)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (T32 AI 07041, K23AI113185, T32AI007041)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Keywords
sexually transmitted infections, HIV-infected men who have sex with men, barriers to testing, chlamydia, syphilis, HIV primary care, patient reluctance, anonymous testing, HIV care clinics
MeSH terms
Adult, Ambulatory Care Facilities, HIV Seropositivity, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Primary Health Care, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, United States, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Bacterial, Homosexuality, Male, Viral Load, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review