Cited by 78Reproductive tract infections researchHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsCervical Cancer and HPV Research

Patterns of extragenital chlamydia and gonorrhea in women and men who have sex with men reporting a history of receptive anal intercourse.

Open access
Danby, Claire S., Cosentino, Lisa A., Rabe, Lorna K., Priest, Carol L., Damare, Khrystine C., Macio, Ingrid S., Meyn, Leslie A., Wiesenfeld, Harold C. +1 more·2016·Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) in men who have sex with men is risk based. Despite high frequencies of oral and receptive anal intercourse (RAI) among women, extragenital screening is not recommended. METHODS: Women (n = 175) and men who have sex with men (n = 224) primarily recruited from a sexually transmitted infection clinic reporting a lifetime history of RAI completed a structured questionnaire and clinician-collected swab samples from the rectum, pharynx, vagina (women), and urine (men). CT and GC were detected using 2 commercial nucleic acid amplification tests (Aptima Combo 2; Hologic, Inc, Bedford, MA; Xpert CT/NG, Cepheid Innovation, Sunnyvale, CA). RESULTS: The median age of the population was 26 years, 62% were white, and 88% were enrolled from a sexually transmitted disease clinic. Men were more likely than women to have GC (22.8% vs. 3.4%) and CT (21.9% vs. 12.6%). In men versus women, GC was detected in 16.5% versus 2.3% of pharyngeal swabs, 11.6% versus 2.3% of rectal swabs, and 5.4% versus 2.9% of urine samples or vaginal swabs. C. trachomatis was detected in 2.2% versus 1.7% of pharyngeal swabs, 17.4% versus 11.4% of rectal swabs, and 4.5% versus 10.3% for urogenital sites in men versus women. Overall 79.6% of CT and 76.5% of GC in men and 18.2% of CT and 16.7% of GC in women were detected only in the pharynx or rectum. CONCLUSION: Reliance on urogenital screening alone misses most of GC and CT in men and more than 15% of infections in women reporting RAI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/olq.0000000000000384

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Approximately 70% of gonococcal and chlamydial infections might be missed if urogenital-only testing is performed among MSM because most pharyngeal and rectal infections are asymptomatic.

    “Approximately 70% of gonococcal and chlamydial infections might be missed if urogenital-only testing is performed among MSM (212–216) because most pharyngeal and rectal infections are asymptomatic.”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [216]

    The Results (Infections by Site) report that urogenital-only testing would miss 80% of chlamydia and 77% of gonorrhea among the MSM studied, supporting the claim's approximate magnitude. The Results (Symptoms Associated with Infection) say men with rectal or pharyngeal infection were no more likely to report symptoms than uninfected men, but do not establish that most such infections were asymptomatic or that this explains the missed infections. The study was limited to MSM reporting a history of receptive anal intercourse. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Danby, C. S., Cosentino, L. A., Rabe, L. K., Priest, C. L., Damare, K. C., Macio, I. S., Meyn, L. A., Wiesenfeld, H. C., & Hillier, S. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Magee-Womens Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Danby, Claire S.
  • Wiesenfeld, Harold C.
  • Hillier, Sharon L.
Venue
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Published
2016-02
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
105-109
ISSN
0148-5717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2412487161
Cited by
78
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (UM1AI068633, UM1AI106707)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Keywords
Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, extragenital infection, receptive anal intercourse, men who have sex with men, women who have sex with men, pharyngeal infection, rectal infection, sexually transmitted infections
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Chlamydia Infections, Chlamydia trachomatis, Female, Gonorrhea, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Pharynx, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rectum, Sexual Behavior, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Vagina, Homosexuality, Male, Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review