Cited by 18Reproductive tract infections researchCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchParasitic Infections and Diagnostics

Genotypic characterization of Trichomonas vaginalis isolates among women who have sex with women in sexual partnerships.

Muzny, Christina A., Rivers, Charles A., Mena, Leandro A., Schwebke, Jane R.·2012·Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Abstract

The random amplified polymorphic DNA technique was used to delineate the genetic relatedness of Trichomonas vaginalis isolates among 3 pairs of mutually infected women who have sex with women in sexual partnerships. One of the 3 pairs of women shared a T. vaginalis isolate with the same random amplified polymorphic DNA banding patterns. Shared use of washcloths to cleanse the vaginal area after receptive oral sex was the most likely method of T. vaginalis transmission among this pair of women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/olq.0b013e31824f1c49

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This possibility is most directly supported by reports of shared trichomonas infections and by concordant drug-resistance genotype testing and phylogenetic linkage analysis identifying HIV transmitted sexually between women.

    “This possibility is most directly supported by reports of shared trichomonas infections (293,294) and by concordant drug-resistance genotype testing and phylogenetic linkage analysis identifying HIV transmitted sexually between women (295,296).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [294]

  • Trichomonas is a relatively common infection among WSW and WSWM, with prevalence rates higher than for chlamydia or gonorrhea, and direct transmission of trichomonas between female partners has been demonstrated.

    “Trichomonas is a relatively common infection among WSW and WSWM, with prevalence rates higher than for chlamydia or gonorrhea (306,307), and direct transmission of trichomonas between female partners has been demonstrated (293,294).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [294]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muzny, C. A., Rivers, C. A., Mena, L. A., & Schwebke, J. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
  • Muzny, Christina A.
  • Rivers, Charles A.
  • Schwebke, Jane R.
Venue
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Published
2012-07
Volume
39
Issue
7
Pages
556-558
ISSN
0148-5717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2332242610
Cited by
18
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Mississippi State Department of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
Keywords
Trichomonas vaginalis, trichomoniasis, women who have sex with women, sexual partnerships, genotype characterization, transmission routes
MeSH terms
Female, Genotype, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Phylogeny, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Trichomonas vaginalis, Trichomonas Vaginitis, DNA, Protozoan, Homosexuality, Female, Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review