Cited by 41Syphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentHIV, TB, and STIs EpidemiologyVector-borne infectious diseases

Epidemiologic characteristics of an ongoing syphilis epidemic among men who have sex with men, San Francisco.

Open access
Bernstein, Kyle T., Stephens, Sally C., Strona, Frank V., Kohn, Robert P., Philip, Susan S.·2013·Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since 2001, San Francisco has experienced a sustained syphilis epidemic that has been nearly exclusively limited to men who have sex with men. We examined the characteristics associated with changes in the syphilis epidemic in San Francisco. METHODS: All primary and secondary (P&S) syphilis cases reported to the San Francisco Department of Public Health between 2001 and 2011 were examined using joinpoint analysis to identify periods within the broader epidemic. Characteristics of the index cases were compared across the periods using χ(2) statistics and t tests. RESULTS: Three distinct periods were identified, an acute increase, decline, and then period of resurgence. In the most recent period of resurgence, compared with earlier periods, patients with P&S syphilis were more likely to have a prior syphilis infection, were older, were more likely to meet partners online, and were more likely to have a partner from outside San Francisco. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of 11 years of P&S syphilis data, several factors were associated with declines or resurgences. Innovative prevention measures are needed to reduce syphilis morbidity among men who have sex with men.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/olq.0b013e31827763ea

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Factors associated with increased vulnerability to STI acquisition among MSM include having multiple partners, anonymous partners, and concurrent partners.

    “Factors associated with increased vulnerability to STI acquisition among MSM include having multiple partners, anonymous partners, and concurrent partners (185,186).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [186]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bernstein, K. T., Stephens, S. C., Strona, F. V., Kohn, R. P., & Philip, S. S.
Affiliations
  • San Francisco Department of Public Health (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
  • Bernstein, Kyle T.
  • Stephens, Sally C.
  • Kohn, Robert P.
  • Philip, Susan S.
Venue
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Published
2013-01
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
11-17
ISSN
0148-5717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046493343
Cited by
41
References
23
Citations by year
2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (H25PS001354, 1h25ps001354-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › HIV, TB, and STIs Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
Keywords
syphilis, men who have sex with men, primary and secondary syphilis, syphilis resurgence, San Francisco, online dating, syphilis prevention, sexually transmitted infections
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Public Health, Risk Factors, San Francisco, Syphilis, Incidence, Homosexuality, Male, Epidemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review