Cited by 98Urban and Rural Development ChallengesIndoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureHomelessness and Social Issues

A Systematic Review of Housing Interventions and Health: Introduction, Methods, and Summary Findings

Jacobs, David E., Brown, Mary Jean, Baeder, Andrea, Sucosky, Marissa Scalia, Margolis, Stephen, Hershovitz, Jerry, Kolb, Laura, Morley, Rebecca L.·2010·Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

Abstract

Subject matter experts systematically reviewed evidence on the effectiveness of specific housing interventions in improving health. The panelists reviewed housing interventions associated with exposure to biological and chemical agents, structural injury hazards, and community-level interventions. Intervention studies were grouped together according to recommendations in the Guide to Community Preventive Services, which identifies similarities in the type of intervention, its delivery and setting, and the target population. Review panelists found that 11 interventions had sufficient evidence of effectiveness, 15 required more field evaluation, 19 needed formative research, and 7 either had no evidence of effectiveness or were ineffective. Although many housing conditions are associated with adverse health outcomes, sufficient evidence now shows that specific housing interventions can improve certain health outcomes. The results of these evidence reviews can inform a robust agenda for widespread implementation and further research. This article highlights the project's research methods and summary findings, and its companion articles detail the evidence reviews for specific housing interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/phh.0b013e3181e31d09

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deferred maintenance of housing and sanitary infrastructure requires urgent remediation and renewal to maintain occupants' health.

    “Deferred maintenance of housing and sanitary infrastructure, often more than a century old, requires urgent remediation and renewal to maintain occupants' health (78).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacobs, D. E., Brown, M. J., Baeder, A., Sucosky, M. S., Margolis, S., Hershovitz, J., Kolb, L., & Morley, R. L.
Affiliations
  • National Center for Healthy Housing (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Jacobs, David E.
Venue
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Published
2010-09
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
S5-S10
ISSN
1078-4659 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998121685
Cited by
98
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Public Health Management and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
Keywords
housing interventions, housing and health, biological exposure, chemical exposure, community-level interventions, intervention effectiveness, housing conditions, health outcomes
MeSH terms
Environmental Health, Health Promotion, Housing, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review