Cited by 25Dysphagia Assessment and ManagementVoice and Speech DisordersStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Upper Esophageal Sphincter Opening During Swallow in Stroke Survivors

Kim, Youngsun, Park, Taeok, Oommen, Elizabeth, McCullough, Gary·2015·American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Timely and efficient upper esophageal sphincter (UES) opening may be critical to safe transport of food or liquid to the stomach and to prevent aspiration during the swallow. The purpose of this study was to examine the temporal and biomechanical characteristics of the UES opening in stroke survivors. METHOD: Maximum duration and width of the UES opening were obtained from 15 stroke survivors with aspiration and 15 stroke survivors with no aspiration. The control group was composed of 15 normal subjects undergoing videofluoroscopic swallowing examinations. The videofluoroscopic swallowing examination protocol was as follows: two swallows of 5 ml thin liquid and two swallows of 10 ml thin liquid. Statistical comparisons were made by repeated measurements of analysis of variance, and the significance level was set at P < 0.025. RESULT: The stroke survivors with aspiration, the stroke survivors without aspiration, and the control group differed significantly for duration of UES opening (P < 0.01) but not maximum width of UES opening. CONCLUSION: Prolonged UES opening may be related to prolonged pharyngeal transition of the bolus and slower UES muscle contraction and hyolaryngeal excursion after stroke.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/phm.0000000000000258

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reduced UES opening diameter, delayed opening onset, or premature closure shorten UES opening duration and can cause pharyngeal residue, which may enter the upper or lower airway and is a known risk factor for pneumonia and airway obstruction.

    “Reduced UES opening diameter, delayed onset of opening, or premature closure attenuate UES opening duration and can result in pharyngeal residue that in turn can enter the upper (laryngeal penetration) or lower (aspiration) airway, which are known risk factors for pneumonia and airway obstruction [23].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, Y., Park, T., Oommen, E., & McCullough, G.
Affiliations
Calvin University (US)
Corresponding author
Kim, Youngsun
Venue
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Published
2015-09
Volume
94
Issue
9
Pages
734-739
ISSN
0894-9115 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030382553
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
upper esophageal sphincter, stroke survivors, dysphagia, aspiration, swallowing biomechanics
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Deglutition, Deglutition Disorders, Female, Fluoroscopy, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Muscle Contraction, Pneumonia, Aspiration, Reference Values, Time Factors, Video Recording, Esophageal Motility Disorders, Treatment Outcome, Survivors, Risk Assessment, Stroke, Esophageal Sphincter, Upper

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review