The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Restoration of Upper Limb Function After Chronic Severe Hemiplegia: A Case Report on the Feasibility of a Brain-Computer Interface-Triggered Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy
Abstract
Functional electrical stimulation therapy (FEST) is a state-of-the-art treatment for retraining motor function after neurological injuries. Recent literature suggests that FEST can be further improved with brain-computer interface (BCI) technology. In this case study, we assessed the feasibility of using BCI-triggered FEST (BCI-FEST) to restore upper limb function in a 57-yr-old man with severe left hemiplegia resulting from a stroke 6 yrs before enrollment in the study. The intervention consisted of two blocks of forty 1-hr BCI-FEST sessions, with three sessions delivered weekly. During therapy, a single-channel BCI was used to trigger the stimulation programmed to facilitate functional movements. The measure of the feasibility of the BCI-FEST included assessing the implementation and safety of the intervention. Clinical improvements were assessed using (a) Functional Independence Measure, (b) Action Research Arm Test, (c) Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – Hand Function Test, and (d) Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity test. Upon completion of 80 therapy sessions, 14-, 17-, and 18-point changes were recorded on Action Research Arm Test, Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity test, and Toronto Rehabilitation Institute – Hand Function Test, respectively. The participant also indicated improvement as demonstrated by his ability to perform various day-to-day tasks. The results suggest that BCI-FEST is safe and viable.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Brain-controlled neuromuscular stimulation also mediated durable functional improvements of the engaged muscles after stroke36 and spinal cord injury22,24,37.”
From Walking naturally after spinal cord injury using a brain–spine interface (2023) · cites this paper as [37]
Citations
Cites
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
Benjamin, E. J., Blaha, M. J., Chiuve, S. E., Cushman, M., Das, S. R., Deo, R., de Ferranti, S. D., Floyd, J., Fornage, M., Gillespie, C., et al. (2017) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000485 · Cited by 12,591
Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles
Pfurtscheller, G., & Lopes da Silva, F. H. (1999) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00141-8 · Cited by 7,328
Tarver, T. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Health On the Internet · doi:10.1080/15398285.2014.902284 · Cited by 5,605
The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance
Fugl-Meyer, A., Jääskö, L., Leyman, I., Olsson, S., & Steglind, S. (1975) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/1650197771331 · Cited by 5,564
The reliability of the functional independence measure: A quantitative review
Ottenbacher, K. J., Hsu, Y., Granger, C. V., & Fiedler, R. C. (1996) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90184-7 · Cited by 1,411
Lyle, R. C. (1981) · International Journal of Rehabilitation Research · doi:10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001 · Cited by 1,326
Brain–computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation
Daly, J. J., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70223-0 · Cited by 1,149
Strategies for stroke rehabilitation
Dobkin, B. H. (2004) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(04)00851-8 · Cited by 738
Page, S. J., Fulk, G. D., & Boyne, P. (2012) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20110009 · Cited by 698
van der Lee, J. H., de Groot, V., Beckerman, H., Wagenaar, R. C., Lankhorst, G. J., & Bouter, L. M. (2001) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.18668 · Cited by 500
Cited by
Walking naturally after spinal cord injury using a brain–spine interface
Lorach, H., Galvez, A., Spagnolo, V., Martel, F., Karakas, S., Intering, N., Vat, M., Faivre, O., Harte, C., Komi, S., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06094-5 · Cited by 631
“Brain-controlled neuromuscular stimulation also mediated durable functional improvements of the engaged muscles after stroke 36 and spinal cord injury 22,24,37 .”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Jovanovic, L. I., Kapadia, N., Lo, L., Zivanovic, V., Popovic, M. R., & Marquez-Chin, C.
- Affiliations
- University Health Network (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Jovanovic, Lazar I.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
- Published
- 2019-02-14
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e35-e40
- ISSN
- 0894-9115 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-7385
- OpenAlex
- W2950499230
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 3.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Keywords
- brain-computer interface, hemiplegia, stroke, chronic stroke, motor retraining, feasibility, hand function, Action Research Arm Test, Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Functional Independence Measure
- MeSH terms
- Stroke Rehabilitation, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Feasibility Studies, Hemiplegia, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Recovery of Function, Upper Extremity, Brain-Computer Interfaces
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Restoration of Upper Limb Function After Chronic Severe Hemiplegia: A Case Report on the Feasibility of a Brain-Computer Interface-Triggered Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/phm.0000000000001163
- The paper
- Jovanovic, L. I., Kapadia, N., Lo, L., Zivanovic, V., Popovic, M. R., & Marquez-Chin, C. (2020). Restoration of Upper Limb Function After Chronic Severe Hemiplegia: A Case Report on the Feasibility of a Brain-Computer Interface-Triggered Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1097/phm.0000000000001163
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.